From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ngnus broken in emacs23 Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:09:12 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87liwhd7yf.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87aacyvac6.fsf@gmail.com> <87sjqqi21a.fsf@lifelogs.com> <871uyai0tz.fsf@gmail.com> <87r569gbuk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zkkxkfm8.fsf@gmail.com> <87r569eqxa.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762nlepsp.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309554602 25982 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2011 21:10:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 21:10:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 23:09:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QckyL-0003RD-Ge for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:09:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45336 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QckyK-00032P-52 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:09:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qckxx-00031a-1o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:09:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qckxr-0000tM-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qckxr-0000tD-8x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:09:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qckxo-00039m-0t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:09:24 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.133 ([38.98.147.133]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:09:24 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.133 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:09:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.133 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IuxQLT0U7jDWX8clSd3Dz2IiBvM= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141409 Archived-At: On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 21:58:30 +0200 Thierry Volpiatto wrote: TV> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 20:41:51 +0200 Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >> TV> Ted Zlatanov writes: >>>> Sorry, I honestly don't know what to fix and what ngnus is. >> TV> http://git.gnus.org/gnus.git >> TV> Some eieio functions (at least one) are missing. TV> Please update eieio library provided with _http://git.gnus.org/gnus.git_ >> >> OK, I understand. I've updated the Gnus Git repository with the EIEIO >> version in the Emacs trunk (only eieio.el was changed since the last >> update). Could you check and let me know? TV> Now what is missing and make error is: TV> make-ert-test Do you mean "make check" in Gnus? Or is this something else broken? What error(s) are you getting? Ted