From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Memory leak due to bidi? Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:23:43 +0900 Message-ID: <87liv9h6n4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87r551hn3k.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312449833 2761 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2011 09:23:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Moreton , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 04 11:23:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qou9d-0002pu-Nx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 11:23:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60921 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qou9c-0007f3-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:23:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qou9a-0007ej-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:23:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qou9Z-0002sl-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:23:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt1.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:50412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qou9Z-0002rh-7M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:23:45 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt1.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3BF3FA06F9; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 18:23:35 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E4DEC1A26F8; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 18:23:43 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.1.93a under 21.5 (beta31) "ginger" cd1f8c4e81cd XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.223 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142861 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > IIUC what Andy is saying is that the problem is in vc-annotate and not > in Bzr itself. It is true that vc-annotate is fairly slow (and the same > holds for grep and compilation output). Ah, OK, the English was arguably ambiguous, but your interpretation is more likely I guess. My bad.