From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnutls memory leak [Was: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint] Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:10:38 +0800 Message-ID: <87lis79d7l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fwix2osa.fsf@gnu.org> <0B3EE7A4-D0D6-4D1E-ADC4-0BEE68F179B2@mit.edu> <87fwivwp37.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87sjmvpmd2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aa93wmc4.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87sjmnrdjw.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87ty73mc0m.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87mxcp2cv0.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87k47rx0t6.fsf_-_@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319695858 26518 80.91.229.12 (27 Oct 2011 06:10:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nix , John Wiegley , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 27 08:10:54 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJJAz-0005EM-MB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 08:10:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60736 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJJAy-0004Fb-Kn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:10:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45424) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJJAv-0004Eu-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:10:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJJAu-0003Ry-DQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:10:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:53948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJJAu-0003Rm-Bn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:10:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [155.69.16.255] (port=35740 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJJAs-0000o0-NC; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 02:10:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k47rx0t6.fsf_-_@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:52:21 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145626 Archived-At: Since no one responded so far, I went ahead and committed a fix for that particular memory leak. I verified that with this fix, the credentials structures are deallocated after sending a mail via SSL; previously they won't. If someone could check whether the memory leak is gone or still persists, that would be great.