From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: process.c: read_process_output: hard coded 4096 bytes read limit
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:03:27 +0200
Message-ID: <87li5w9jkg.fsf@zigzag.favinet>
References: <kq3ssm$b00$1@ger.gmane.org> <87txkpjhvd.fsf@igel.home>
	<kqbjso$6fk$1@ger.gmane.org> <87sj059j9o.fsf@zigzag.favinet>
	<jwvzjud6mjp.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372312879 13545 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2013 06:01:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:01:19 +0000 (UTC)
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 27 08:01:20 2013
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Us5Gh-0006TH-Nn
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:01:19 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59141 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Us5Gh-0002ad-DO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:01:19 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44918)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ttn@gnu.org>)
	id 1Us5Ge-0002aX-4g
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:01:16 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ttn@gnu.org>) id 1Us5Gc-0001QC-Vw
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:01:16 -0400
Original-Received: from smtp205.alice.it ([82.57.200.101]:51528)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ttn@gnu.org>)
	id 1Us5Gc-0001NU-Ku
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:01:14 -0400
Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (95.244.64.77) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.15)
	id 51B4DE4B04263BEE for emacs-devel@gnu.org;
	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:01:04 +0200
Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <ttn@gnu.org>) id 1Us5Iv-0002RD-RP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:03:37 +0200
In-Reply-To: <jwvzjud6mjp.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message
	of "Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:16:13 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
	recognized.
X-Received-From: 82.57.200.101
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161128
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/161128>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

() Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
() Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:16:13 -0400

   But accept-process-output is synchronous: while running it, nothing
   else can happen.  It's important to make sure that the performance is
   good enough with accept-process-output but it should *also* be good
   enough without accept-process-output.

I cannot agree or disagree w/o knowing the particulars.  In the case of
gnugo.el, message size never exceeds a few kilobytes, and performance is
not critical.  Anyway, i'm interested in hearing what choices OP makes.

=2D-=20
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlHL1bEACgkQZwMiJEyAdQJIewCgy6xzzpryS0fyAfAbNgnOjP2j
aXEAn053GA2lnvUSJrXqECZKI89ulMjc
=MkrS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--