From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: process.c: read_process_output: hard coded 4096 bytes read limit Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:03:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87li5w9jkg.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <87txkpjhvd.fsf@igel.home> <87sj059j9o.fsf@zigzag.favinet> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372312879 13545 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2013 06:01:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:01:19 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 27 08:01:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Us5Gh-0006TH-Nn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:01:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59141 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Us5Gh-0002ad-DO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:01:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44918) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Us5Ge-0002aX-4g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Us5Gc-0001QC-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp205.alice.it ([82.57.200.101]:51528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Us5Gc-0001NU-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:01:14 -0400 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (95.244.64.77) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.15) id 51B4DE4B04263BEE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:01:04 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Us5Iv-0002RD-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:03:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:16:13 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.101 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161128 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Stefan Monnier () Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:16:13 -0400 But accept-process-output is synchronous: while running it, nothing else can happen. It's important to make sure that the performance is good enough with accept-process-output but it should *also* be good enough without accept-process-output. I cannot agree or disagree w/o knowing the particulars. In the case of gnugo.el, message size never exceeds a few kilobytes, and performance is not critical. Anyway, i'm interested in hearing what choices OP makes. =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlHL1bEACgkQZwMiJEyAdQJIewCgy6xzzpryS0fyAfAbNgnOjP2j aXEAn053GA2lnvUSJrXqECZKI89ulMjc =MkrS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--