From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r115470: eww: exit and close actions Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:07:20 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87lhzggwjb.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> References: <87haadq3pn.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <878uvoq0md.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <8761qso84n.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87d2kwmo1l.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <8738loiz5o.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87mwjwxsjf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387505794 7066 80.91.229.3 (20 Dec 2013 02:16:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 02:16:34 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 20 03:16:40 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vtpdn-0007La-OA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 03:16:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47218 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtoeF-0000vK-9A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtoXh-0002a3-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:06:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtoXb-0005wg-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:06:17 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtoXb-0005wJ-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 20:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VtoXa-0001aP-2z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 02:06:10 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 02:06:10 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 02:06:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dHq7IkpcqjNCmoC9kG6zoYhXdQ4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166643 Archived-At: On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:41:40 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote: SJT> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:30:06 -0500 Glenn Morris wrote: >> GM> Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> >> I don't want to brute-force it as a reverse patch. >> I'm used to the Git workflow, where "git revert" will DTRT for this SJT> "git revert" or "git reset"? "git revert" *exactly* applies a reverse SJT> patch, and can be used to precisely reverse the effect of any earlier SJT> change in one operation (assuming no conflicts). "git reset" OTOH SJT> leaves no trace of the earlier patch -- or any changes since then, so SJT> you need to reapply ("rebase") them. I meant "git revert" precisely. "git reset" rewrites history, which in a public repo is considered bad practice (no need to get into details). Ted