From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: application/x-patch MIME type used by Gnus? (was: Rant - Emacs mail is not user friendly) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:01:56 +0900 Message-ID: <87lhm3cssr.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <871tp4wut1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87mw7qvign.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87bno5ulbu.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ppbf8sgi.fsf_-_@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419019364 11774 80.91.229.3 (19 Dec 2014 20:02:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 20:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Reiner Steib Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 19 21:02:38 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y23l0-0000U2-AS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 21:02:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60379 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y23kz-00047R-NC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:02:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y23kg-00047G-W8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:02:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y23kZ-0008L3-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:02:18 -0500 Original-Received: from shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.161]:50283) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y23kZ-0008GV-7S; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:02:11 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BA3C1C3911; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:01:56 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 60EC31A2CFC; Sat, 20 Dec 2014 05:01:56 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87ppbf8sgi.fsf_-_@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" acf1c26e3019 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.161 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:180343 Archived-At: Reiner Steib writes: > I cannot reproduce this. > > emacs -Q / M-x message-mail RET / C-c C-a /tmp/foo.patch RET > results in type="text/x-diff" here. It might have been application/x-diff; it was a while back. > Maybe your /etc/mime.types specifies "application/x-patch"? Mine is irrelevant. These were patches received by Mailman at xemacs.org, which got stripped because we deny application/* MIME types. If Gnus has stopped doing that, I'm glad, but at the time people were trying to tell me that it's a good idea.