From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnu.org>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:28:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lhkqhro6.fsf@zigzag.favinet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3WlAOmGl4RQBG09UiGavcwZwdqzrac0HS8Fc6alaxbN@local> (Kelly Dean's message of "Mon, 26 Jan 2015 03:52:17 +0000")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1073 bytes --]
() Kelly Dean <kelly@prtime.org>
() Mon, 26 Jan 2015 03:52:17 +0000
If I'm just part of a minority that fails to understand that
⌜default⌝ is the most sensible term for the Emacs environment
whose variables don't shadow variables in any other
environment, then of course the term shouldn't be changed.
But if I'm part of a majority that fails to understand, then
resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
This particular line of thinking has led to "hacker" being a
denigration in society at large, among other more serious
atrocities.
I think if you program in C, it is easy to see how ‘switch’
.. ‘default:’ illustrates the dynamic aspect of the concept.
Rather than "this thing does not shadow", i see "this action is
the last recourse".
[Insert Pirsig-esque ruminations, here...]
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502
(if you're human and you know it)
read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
(not (via 'mailing-list)))
=> nil
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-26 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-23 2:59 Rant - Elisp terminology is deceptive Kelly Dean
2015-01-23 20:15 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-01-24 0:41 ` Kelly Dean
2015-01-24 0:48 ` Óscar Fuentes
2015-01-24 3:28 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-01-24 8:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-24 10:32 ` Kelly Dean
2015-01-24 11:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-01-24 10:30 ` Kelly Dean
2015-01-24 11:03 ` David Kastrup
2015-01-24 23:24 ` Kelly Dean
2015-01-25 9:16 ` David Kastrup
2015-01-26 3:52 ` Kelly Dean
2015-01-26 8:28 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-22 3:44 [PATCH] Desktop mode saves mark-ring too verbosely Kelly Dean
2013-11-23 13:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-01-21 12:11 ` Kelly Dean
2015-01-21 15:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-01-22 5:43 ` Kelly Dean
2015-01-22 8:20 ` Ivan Shmakov
2015-01-23 13:20 ` Kelly Dean
2015-01-23 14:09 ` Ivan Shmakov
2015-01-24 3:08 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2015-01-24 23:30 ` Elisp terminology (was: Re: [PATCH] Desktop mode saves mark-ring too verbosely) Kelly Dean
2015-01-25 9:49 ` Elisp terminology David Kastrup
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lhkqhro6.fsf@zigzag.favinet \
--to=ttn@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).