From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oleh Krehel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding a few more finder keywords Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:43:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87lhfukxyv.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87sia2l04r.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433778613 6149 80.91.229.3 (8 Jun 2015 15:50:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Artur Malabarba , emacs-devel To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 08 17:49:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1zJ8-0000nk-PA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 17:49:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58691 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1zJ8-0006wB-4u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:49:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1zJ4-0006w0-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:49:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1zJ0-00080z-Lb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:49:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]:36485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1zJ0-00080m-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 11:49:42 -0400 Original-Received: by wgbgq6 with SMTP id gq6so106937442wgb.3 for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 08:49:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=asCYPdomxqukseb0YRGQK7m5+kNYrzgHGiC8PmTqXec=; b=q2dwpSdgSZeyqIWu9/MKuYzGzh+n8xd9Tzh66CN+ENO+clJ58KtYRW6gOe8O5ouTkt lT0LRjQE9nC6Dj5jLXnNVe+s+HNxJ9yhS0Oe+quk9K0FGaceAnu5GjwJCqgxxBhsGmKx 7tGePoFslg40rYP+l0Wj9uycsoc6qdi5Ar+scmrlZpQyULMPbvIUAr8Qhtl6ZyTxcs0g UaF98ej4YtkhuqNYPCpR0NYuxcp/VlEgryIcAMRNkQU7K5Xyjj4oOJIdPTGQxe9TXo23 uJVfkW2PgZwNnKzI2kjTuQRaCf5knebICEBQQ4RWReZ1L9Y48D/kVMittBaAIZRoL4sN WhoA== X-Received: by 10.194.192.98 with SMTP id hf2mr33755108wjc.23.1433778581511; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 08:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from firefly (dyn069045.nbw.tue.nl. [131.155.69.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z12sm4925435wjq.12.2015.06.08.08.49.40 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Jun 2015 08:49:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 8 Jun 2015 08:37:13 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c00::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187100 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> I've just added `checkdoc-package-keywords' that checks if the >> current file's keywords are in `finder-known-keywords'. > > Why? There is no reason to signal to users that there might be > a problem if they use keywords that are not in `finder-known-keywords'. It's a matter of checking the current keywords against a list of keywords that are known to be good. `finder-known-keywords' is a good start for such a list. > The purpose of `finder-known-keywords' is not to suggest that other > keywords are a mistake. File-header `Keywords:' is for arbitrary > labels that any user can make use of. It is not only for "standard" > keywords that might be "known" to Emacs at any state, let alone to > Emacs at startup. I've provided a command that a package developer can voluntarily call to make sure that the keywords he chose are sound. It is for the benefit of all users if >2000 known packages can be organized by a smallish list of keywords, with no redundant synonyms, typos etc. If a package author doesn't want to conform to the keyword guidelines that I propose to recommend, fine: it's just a recommendation. Oleh