From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Joost Kremers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Window splitting issues with margins Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 21:47:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87lha0s3ys.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <874mgrwerb.fsf@fastmail.fm> <5644A2AC.3080703@gmx.at> <871tbux3vb.fsf@fastmail.fm> <564599A6.6060306@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447656378 2197 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2015 06:46:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:46:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 16 07:46:07 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyDYE-0002gE-Vd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 07:46:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45836 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZyDYE-0004ih-EC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 01:46:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zxhjf-0001MC-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:47:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zxhja-0000YI-05 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:33957) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZxhjZ-0000YE-QL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:47:41 -0500 Original-Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B9B202B1 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:47:41 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:47:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=cQtVCDd9DQPJZFdB/TTT1CcORqE=; b=oluZ6C uiq5mbEWxhGrEuYNLGijzLGaKwJQRW34PNWbMif7RGaivfd3VjEHkbkYK4B1kzfC unw1luEDYeBD07ekrW/SA0H/vM8m+ol22COxKlr2NzswSucFoexPRcAbVZLYkQYS dvVO5g/m4AJDDw0srzqDcKHy5SyPH1LgvottE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=cQtVCDd9DQPJZFd B/TTT1CcORqE=; b=IwJBCrXybcBe84CGO3kAMDl0rqzMMDWYeLBFATV/5wUk26T fA9ZjfzBXMxWMW7+e+L/axDhv2LBBIIpENs0GwvqKAFmrFMUjp55Xyhbr2ZsR439 6yLZzogaPLZ1nrNuEY+LHrfMZfUQHRAmk5K53uHyjPMrf78kkscYvrkjsuEM= X-Sasl-enc: R1FrSvHWG3ivKizUUDdY4SWX6/tpCadpYIrQcyuVthO5 1447534061 Original-Received: from IdeaPad.messagingengine.com (x4d0ad6fa.dyn.telefonica.de [77.10.214.250]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D7AEE680108; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 15:47:40 -0500 (EST) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 24.5.50.1 In-reply-to: <564599A6.6060306@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.29 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194499 Archived-At: On Fr, Nov 13 2015, martin rudalics wrote: > The question is whether it makes any sense for two packages to ever > share one and the same margin. I doubt that. Like I said in my other post, there are apparently people wanting to use linum-mode and writeroom-mode at the same time. > > Well, I've been using a modified `window-splittable-p' in my init file > > for quite some time and *I* don't have any complaints. ;-) > > But you are aware of the fact that ‘window-splittable-p’ is used only by > the buffer display functions. All other ‘split-window’ calls (including > C-x 3) don't care about it. Yes, I'm aware of that. Those aren't a problem, because writeroom-mode has a chance to adjust the margins using a function in window-configuration-change-hook. -- Joost Kremers Life has its moments