From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Questioning the new behavior of `open-line'. Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 17:34:50 -0600 Message-ID: <87lh9ttvfp.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87vb98csu1.fsf@red-bean.com> <87si4bsktk.fsf@red-bean.com> <87wptnlbl6.fsf@gmx.us> <87pozfl2ut.fsf@gmx.us> <87d1vfl17p.fsf@gmx.us> <878u63p6sh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pozfchq6.fsf@red-bean.com> <87h9komkty.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ziydbgnd.fsf@red-bean.com> <87r3jnoxpc.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447976106 32478 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2015 23:35:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 23:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , Pierpaolo Bernardi , emacs-devel To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 20 00:35:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzYjF-0002c7-Ac for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 00:35:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44514 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzYjE-00019n-LY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:35:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzYjB-000186-Dh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:34:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzYj7-000849-Cy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:34:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]:36212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZzYj7-000844-8a; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:34:53 -0500 Original-Received: by iofh3 with SMTP id h3so106910870iof.3; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:34:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=k8mvP8PQkBdGVQTwePRdYm2PTJh9lzMwV9eR1mr1nzg=; b=tnZFkGjMps21bvETGPmhvO6L1TyYcOYhClKAd4BSIgCJZ4BBYuCUBuH1uKXCpn6HzO wF7WOy/MK46vZuk1MzqKnU8pWroZCDhHUxKsEFt5VL4JJIiEwWt2ydXCj83PPhtbHCx0 Lq2P0hg6M7gxkIzQs/xKmcbOmp8aB8KCT4oCs/H9m2OJ8hTeUKh0SXXnXwueQcFUfVXq gjznd7lXYUmN+PTp9F6vQBwEx0i1A/kH3zsDl+pdioHbsvLZ+ZP4DiXw3fnaYQrwufmQ PvbBCFJYTxL8tp6jwUxPpMu3gE/r1wATC4KBGRxyBC3PYIs4GEmyT6kP7PuGguE/aeBg tUhA== X-Received: by 10.107.39.193 with SMTP id n184mr11127038ion.14.1447976092599; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:34:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from floss (74-92-190-114-Illinois.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [74.92.190.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4sm2119974igz.2.2015.11.19.15.34.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 15:34:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Artur Malabarba's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2015 21:03:58 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:194831 Archived-At: Artur Malabarba writes: >2015-11-18 20:32 GMT+00:00 Karl Fogel : >> Thanks for letting us know, Artur. >> >> If you're swamped, I'm happy to do the reversion (pretty easy for >> me, since I've been following the changes & the thread in detail), >> but I won't unless you say so. > >Yes, you have my "OK" to revert this change completely. TBH, this >doesn't really affect me :-). Normally I just use >aggressive-indent-mode for all my indentation needs. I only realised I >wanted to change C-o while doing some edits from emacs -Q. > >However, if you do revert, it would be nice if you kept the tests I >added (some of them will need to be fixed, of course). Done, in commit c593538968a on the 'emacs-25' branch. (I think I don't need to do anything special to port this over to 'master', right? It'll just happen automagically at some point?) Best regards, -Karl