From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dima Kogan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Embedded modifiers in the regex engine Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:23:11 -0700 Message-ID: <87lh51yo5c.fsf@secretsauce.net> References: <87ziupinhq.fsf@secretsauce.net> <83oab4g407.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvqnet3t.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpppioxi.fsf@secretsauce.net> <83povgakpy.fsf@gnu.org> <871t6v1mdb.fsf@secretsauce.net> <83oa9yy643.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb46zdf5.fsf@secretsauce.net> <834mbqxxxx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459286645 9961 80.91.229.3 (29 Mar 2016 21:24:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 21:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 23:23:54 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1al177-0002ik-Gd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:23:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50072 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1al173-0003gB-OI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:23:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1al16n-0003ex-HZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:23:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1al16k-0007kS-F4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:23:29 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:47606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1al16j-0007jn-5R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:23:26 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F327220FB6 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:23:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:23:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secretsauce.net; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=xFmAr 1Hcg1X/kh7XLuQILP4BFc8=; b=N5RuB3axXQt4XowRV/lnU94j7mr1atGx6MHYM J9kpcA46wAgQGf8Pacyl6wOA8Vn8pas3lsBPxfyg+d4GTSGHINaV+ebc/RkyAR1E KTfyOtpZvgfZT3or4CLFNKLMPVXD7zHqiLwH1RSs7yVBly2IWchvTl46WGEcWM0x ekt/3g= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=xFmAr1Hcg1X/kh7XLuQILP4BFc8=; b=bVeSl M2c8IYYTehUVsmPnYGTiJrS6jshLRDmBN65kHO38DADkJYm3I1Xfm54Z860ZZdCv ZYbif6J1e83b9EDfZg797OLmmJxvp5CN/tq1t44oXJyZSWbifxcdcETuw6w8y7Dl lmvswL9AKgHUuX9AwBLihzduPQI4c6cNPgxDOE= X-Sasl-enc: xB8cyGZcIzWk4RLAdnwhXaz0sJBi7Mt4PjsseDTFlP4b 1459286602 Original-Received: from shorty.attlocal.net (162-195-124-174.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [162.195.124.174]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D9DAEC00018; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 17:23:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from localhost6.attlocal.net ([::1] helo=shorty) by shorty.local with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1al16W-0002J3-3R; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:23:12 -0700 User-agent: mu4e 0.9.11; emacs 25.0.92.1 In-reply-to: <834mbqxxxx.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202416 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > What's wrong with the existing one? >> >> Maybe nothing. I'd like to add a feature, but if there are plans to >> abandon the current implementation, then I want to add my feature to >> whatever the new implementation is. > > AFAIK, no one works on replacing the current implementation. So we > should talk about the changes first, and worry about replacing the > current code later. OK. I'll go back to look at my earlier work to add the feature to the current implementation. >> > Also, please provide log messages for the changes. >> >> What kind of log messages? Git logs? These are terse because this >> project seems to have strict guidelines, and other messages I see are >> generally very terse. What would you like? > > See CONTRIBUTE: they should be Git log messages in the ChangeLog > format. Can you please be more specific about what is missing in the patches I sent? Thanks dima