From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vc-state and unregistered Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:07:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87lh43upd9.fsf@gmx.de> References: <6ok2vyzwf9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <08f70cda-44be-0657-e50a-2b2c80d2c21c@yandex.ru> <87oa9dzgl0.fsf@gmx.de> <87potshczh.fsf@gmx.de> <87bn57otja.fsf_-_@gmx.de> <515b3451-820d-ad50-8c98-d0330a0f4266@yandex.ru> <87lh4arpbg.fsf@gmx.de> <87ega2rodp.fsf@gmx.de> <87vb37ury1.fsf@gmx.de> <87potfuqdt.fsf@gmx.de> <557a2987-39e8-051e-55fd-678bc01a6a40@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461503282 29219 80.91.229.3 (24 Apr 2016 13:08:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 13:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 24 15:07:51 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1auJlO-0003n4-Ty for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:07:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55340 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJlO-0003He-Ba for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:07:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34033) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJl9-0003DE-Ey for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:07:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJl6-0007ZM-AL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:07:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:56175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auJl6-0007YD-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 09:07:32 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([79.195.30.210]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4WRI-1bdEND0MdI-00yigS; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:07:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <557a2987-39e8-051e-55fd-678bc01a6a40@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:49:01 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:94D7Xio3HLDHkjqEOLnlFjUTpZuzyJIzJLbtvIlcjidmFM8VZk4 8uPGnd68m4UofMcicEFCyFWxwvT3TR0ksRR2/XOFAnAzwu0pG3QTXuhhf8RZ9SF2rbW1P6f b+WCxM9ZddwD+IbSGMBBI+0kRlTT3cTMm4nRaxPKOU4XpKNYwPxpV/5kKQ7lODh0SnNfLLA TXSkj0af77QzXdrieuCOg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:FrnOT7sbTP8=:B3hYx7ICkRMT7u5gOoZ3qT dd4ZzRkJC5roNec6wyXnXecy5/cwEtiovhUsTNTYR0j4QCJKDjVmf6sduoDXWNJFjmDhe8fvr 2jCl+Lz6Ww5QcLb/i69HgDmhYXf0QehkxdNQXl3lIrC3MgspGenCWODLaDMBmmLMvWPHY1gdy vZnF5hBRqzHiygr92bqfa6dzAuLKxufZl+7LaVHS+vEZqDKhfXTNHgejHFdiDpHxcn7BL144a zUEWAc2dZVttg6NsUGh9OrnI4XcKrU+/yHac0ykasmhJgejxTs8CLbtEjWy9cz4GY92FrKzmS CGSpXwscj6ufhsUjspRaaew5+hepwzRlT2Njg/zM9l0ck0Er72YFP8ZL9vSLWt+Sivv9ihPKb hZ4YRdA8hkzO/vvutElpfFhP7hJYuGoretyHFUnVq5oG5hSFgXTQVnO+/jxJa6xgUa1wJ3plR 3E8E0G7+9TSJ5PXA7KCRF/jMADFAnOHXRmVzJwxlWJC7yTVgJ4Yf/OFQNrE+R+ytAOmknk34A jSdBMyR63TUIO2CtJtsX6L92NnE4AbUFuZc/HnIrL6iAtmydlzfcGNuf902W3DVEsH9uwPpan EaWr+D0MMxmBAOwONSRprJFrQfxHPRLXkmRgw3hYvuymvN0zivGQGjzDNhspzp0dh+pFBwXSA lZzHS5bhHmfDex8LnfbQSOG1FQAZOzg2pgRR7YqXWMZcXVN8t8y0KmVp7pLVJCf3l/pjJiJrA gsEyhlFZ31tatmTlHNHiJ2AFNMy2+NPmZhVAykawhmOzSIiheTXNE5X+PHddtlU8zso0gUOI X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203248 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 04/24/2016 03:45 PM, Michael Albinus wrote: > >>> The actual behavior will not change. This is what I'm proposing: to >>> put the current behavior of (vc-state FILE) into spec. >> >> Sometimes it returns nil, sometimes unregistered. > > When does it return `unregistered'? See my recent commit. >> Is this really what we >> want to offer as a spec? > > Just nil, obviously. That's not what's specified. >> I'm going to push my changes accumulated over the last weeks. You will >> see by the comments in vc-test--state, that the situation has been >> improved. Less FIXME comments. I'm not saying that I'm satisfied already ... > > What about my changes? I have applied some of them. I have not applied the reversion of calling vc-responsible-backend instead of vc-backend, because I'm not convinced yet that this is proper. vc-state returns unregistered now in most of the cases when it should, as it is specified. Pls show me the bugs, I might have introduced. And yes, I have ackmnowledged already that we must speak about performance. Best regards, Michael.