From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recent commit modifying mark-whole-buffer (master/aeb613ea95b7970e66d663ec5cba54e9ec0528fa) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 23:40:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87lh3x4dkb.fsf@gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461879660 1073 80.91.229.3 (28 Apr 2016 21:41:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 21:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Kaushal Modi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 28 23:40:50 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1avtg2-0005t0-00 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 23:40:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51124 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avtg1-00088i-DM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:40:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avtfu-00082o-SF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:40:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avtfs-0007E6-61 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:40:42 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:53405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avtfs-0007Dq-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:40:40 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avtfp-0000ZI-Dg; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 23:40:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Thu, 28 Apr 2016 20:24:07 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203406 Archived-At: Kaushal Modi writes: > Question: > - Should we revert mark-whole-buffer to its definition before this commit and > mark-whole-buffer and make the cursor intangible by default in minibuffer > prompt? I have no opinion. I've always thought it really weird that the minibuffer prompt is reachable at all by any commands, but I guess that sail has shipped a long time ago... -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no