From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: network process timeouts Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 15:24:38 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87lgyju495.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87wpi4azuf.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474580231 17544 195.159.176.226 (22 Sep 2016 21:37:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:37:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 22 23:37:04 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bnBfy-0003Kr-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 23:37:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnBfw-0000Ih-Io for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60914) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnAgl-0003Ao-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:33:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnAgg-0005Cr-D2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:33:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=48379 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnAgg-00057E-6X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:33:42 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bn9by-0004RE-9s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 21:24:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:GQZLe4YSoTBVbhb9dX0H8fS8Myc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207717 Archived-At: On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 14:54:22 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: LI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> If I've missed existing functionality to do network timeouts, please let >> me know. LI> Timeout parameters would be nice, but you end up having to do some kind LI> of "global" timeout anyway, so in many cases it's surprisingly LI> non-useful. :-) OK... so I shouldn't bother? Or I'm approaching it wrong? I thought having a timeout in `make-network-process' was the right place for a global timeout per process, and then the underlying implementation can choose what to do with that parameter. Ted