From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making DOC argument of define-minor-mode optional Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:59:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87lgwaxk3z.fsf@petton.fr> References: <83eg226vr5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479916805 651 195.159.176.226 (23 Nov 2016 16:00:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 23 16:59:58 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Zxl-0007IU-NL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:59:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34671 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Zxp-00009I-7X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:00:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54089) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Zxi-00009A-NE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:59:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Zxi-0003ok-1W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:59:54 -0500 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:50806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c9Zxd-0003fA-AD; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:59:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83eg226vr5.fsf@gnu.org> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1479916786; bh=ke8HlJdH8b1ZzopNSGpDnDLxn4w/8siDXu2lB8gVOoU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nZVLYZM9f2QjlTkcv6vckhprUPXn7ckfFh5+P0/oKQTKurZMKnawMmo5ac6gFs0Ui5Koik1AJugySRfhxNoUOqG4JeUeULodegxxufu/pZ82wtbsAE/W/M+nTnx3ySgoIrUV/QaO6Upd6nrMeNhWUJoJLxNUnZN/uAtX3LZdh+I= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 89.234.186.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209567 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Eli Zaretskii writes: >> the docstring created by define-minor-mode with nil DOC is useful and often better than what users write. >> Should DOC therefore be optional? > > Not sure we would like to educate Lisp programmers to stop thinking > about good doc strings. I agree. Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYNbzwAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQ710IAJHPPkPEV8Fp46ut3DD0LK2u V/rX8tXcFxReWfhZ8BALyqgdbvxAkthhHjY7HegfqHu4cbCN9ea0qgmZRqG52cx3 WGA8oLREQlgYKZidKSyhvwo4PEIJUQdumIhENtMd8dAredbLM8bZuE32R52hGwyQ pnwZqU6WGwkgaroDukR02+OvqmfJMpsvRlX4EXbvfNHGNLdR+KdDg8H48pKLuP9o jdLYx2IC+wIUbgu6H2z64VBl13MGSYRNEJRYwd+/vx33vlop1wZCfoGoBbVPXkKM ksGZnqGzsS8SiEOeaBBOVTUmJky3x63zGyfZsoRgpq8VAiG7SpjWdyeMColINVM= =z+3m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--