From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Toon Claes Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC] size of issue tracker Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 10:43:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87lfz9h1ex.fsf@iotcl.com> References: <1552789070.5272.1@yandex.ru> <87imwhmmt8.fsf@gmail.com> <87y347g1l3.fsf@iotcl.com> <9ac21e82-8e47-f9b5-f88d-23c0c56946d1@yandex.ru> <87pnpc1lby.fsf@iotcl.com> <83zhoezdqc.fsf@gnu.org> <87imuivfcr.fsf@iotcl.com> <83k1eyfxls.fsf@gnu.org> <17D21056-10B2-4813-AE90-9B2706936CE9@icloud.com> <83imuifqjc.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfzehrug.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1exec2n.fsf@gnu.org> <8736lkikqf.fsf@gmail.com> <83y33cb5nc.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7fsf91l.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnongeju.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvdy9rpm.fsf@gnu.org> <8736liuqmw.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="17107"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , agrambot@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 14 10:43:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQT1t-0004Fw-Pi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 10:43:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42681 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQT1s-0000qt-Kj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:43:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQT1m-0000qe-Sl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQT1l-0007aB-Vm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:43:14 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.soverin.net ([159.69.232.142]:60435) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQT1j-0007Nr-7q; Tue, 14 May 2019 04:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from soverin.net by soverin.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=soverin.net; s=customer; t=1557823386; bh=FyWwVJ7535k2LUqpi9mKv14ryOfFS7AGJ7X8kQwdbFs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=mfPZ63tmRU8b7AeTwuPn18wQNbGIOXu77xJjGi3v1QLARWlt/oJc5cWSEReetu6er dS7jAxuBJGAkG4e0l6M7g3rBXdez26813fLr3bY4U4B2RUTxxkNwQZy7BvUjqkdsFA epYoy+hze0edkNp4BeyUGSLXAr9XGqek1GbXTJY4= Gcc-Self: nnimap+soverin:Sent In-Reply-To: <8736liuqmw.fsf@gnu.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Mon, 13 May 2019 20:59:51 +0200") X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.3 at c03mi01 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 159.69.232.142 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236495 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tassilo Horn writes: > I think the bottleneck here is the current GitLab API. If I find some > time, I can re-run the procedure with an even bigger GitHub project. > I've read GitHub has a more efficient GraphQL API for this stuff, and > AFAIK, GitLab is or will implement something similar, so this slowness > might be resolved in the mid-term future. Yeah, the GitLab API doesn't have a great reputation regarding speed. Although you are probably testing on GitLab.com. That instance of GitLab has a tremendious database of issues. If we would do similar tests on EMBA, I hope we'd get better results. But we only know for sure if we do a real test. I'll try to set up such test later this week. =2D-=20 Toon --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEqpqkV/lEuXKD1KF3MRQ6gtMrOJcFAlzaf5YACgkQMRQ6gtMr OJfhGw/+MBWxOEPJ8Imit2KXaTLx/DCtWcZgSOKWpHArYH3MTh7ZnCOaOdmhR8Ph 968ChYTv+vyT471mPvaDPtO0z2fput2tVwigLwsvqlGbrlRZjXnVEW1mEYf1plDC l88zyW/h3YFLDpKjWDyoy/Gmmhgtl3XSKyGF1oLxL9YM5r0ewcGhALi9Y51Ftj3L qbHUaSml0S3CBtPe2AxIh1IvY444at0ruU1F72APF3hEa/xn2ya3abcpG7MPusxm 1BVabUFlcezc2+shAAoXLy4bZ8NV75yZs9UEmJp+oaBCsChjqGCQ3yHe7ZnacAgL MSzMtVuC7WTjvliZATCLzRBwazJ6/VURuU/a2afx/K7mUB5hfX7dIP9CYckijzqe jce1Ph7f/nACk1m8hRNtfjqiF4F02uFDtCATOZzAhScVQO8UtmHpbwasfCuUXsGq 3hSDpChyuIrGavwzVwHKeVFwG98LcGt3AZrxZlA2uPpRTMM+lFSfW1e9Ywn31Xo7 WsrnUmWlV50rJoOSwG0pd8zoan2pyEwcep8gOGf4WMo8lmg5CKjMIQTjMq6vhfgO 4jgQydcql8Cvel55ExqXub+ELn/Y3xKYwwqnwrvi2q1487dFmEk698fApLdGXrkZ qWdZGWM9w29aEvY6Kw0nqVasMPVQGX39mMsuVh0ORdej4n5sLPA= =BUaf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--