From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Cochran Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enable persistent naming for tabs Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2019 14:08:28 -0800 Message-ID: <87lfswbokj.fsf@cochranmail.com> References: <87r23lpg22.fsf@cochranmail.com> <871rvktgyj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ftjz6v4d.fsf@cochranmail.com> <87lftoiwfl.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87eez7la3v.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878spddbpj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87eez3xwi1.fsf@cochranmail.com> <87ftjjfb4h.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r230akt8.fsf@cochranmail.com> <87mudoak6j.fsf@cochranmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="175358"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "T.V Raman" , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Juri Linkov To: Robert Cochran Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 03 23:26:39 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iROKT-000jP3-OI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 23:26:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56614 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRO5D-0000KQ-Ee for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 17:10:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60246) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iRO4X-0000K2-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 17:10:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRO4W-00013X-2L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 17:10:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.cochranmail.com ([64.140.150.170]:39014) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iRO4V-0000fV-2l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Nov 2019 17:10:08 -0500 Original-Received: from SoraLaptop (174-21-75-207.tukw.qwest.net [174.21.75.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cochranmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5829D1484; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 14:09:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87mudoak6j.fsf@cochranmail.com> (Robert Cochran's message of "Fri, 25 Oct 2019 09:01:24 -0700") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.140.150.170 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241769 Archived-At: Robert Cochran writes: > Robert Cochran writes: > >> Implemented in the attached patch. Please let me know what you all >> think. >> > > Blah, failed to spot-check and pull master before hand. New patch has > been rebased on master, so no more merge errors. Sorry about that! > Looks like this patch is still hanging in the air... did we want to wait on this until after we decided that we want post-open and pre-close hooks, or do we want to do something with this regardless? I still think that the hooks/function list and this feature (close-last-tab-choice) are complimentary and should both be implemented. Thanks, -- ~Robert Cochran GPG Fingerprint - BD0C 5F8B 381C 64F0 F3CE E7B9 EC9A 872C 41B2 77C2