From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [partially solved] Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:00:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87lf94p5ah.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7ju87n5.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87bla18d4k.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87tuntt8f0.fsf@gnu.org> <874kfsvkrq.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87o8e0p8u4.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnsos0eo.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22916"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.5.12; emacs 28.0.50 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uwe Brauer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 27 09:19:03 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHzq-0005fN-6c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 09:19:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39636 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHzp-0008SJ-Ad for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:19:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52726) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHw5-0004hV-PK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45165) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHw5-0006rQ-Ah; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.228]:57511) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lbHw1-0002ib-T4; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFE627C0054; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:15:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:15:05 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdduledgudegkecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfhgfhffvufffjgfkgggtsehttd ertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghsshhilhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhhesghhnuhdr ohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdelteeuhfetvddtkeegfeefudfglefhueduff evgeekffdujeelleetkedvkeelnecuffhomhgrihhnpehrvghmvghmsggvrhdrohhrghen ucfkphepkeejrdduieefrdefuddrudehgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhorhhnodhmvghsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshho nhgrlhhithihqdekieejfeekjeekgedqieefhedvleekqdhtshguhheppehgnhhurdhorh hgsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: from thinkpad-t440p (p57a31f9a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.163.31.154]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 03:15:04 -0400 (EDT) In-reply-to: <87wnsos0eo.fsf@mat.ucm.es> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268521 Archived-At: Uwe Brauer writes: Hi Uwe, > What's about these package that require an older version of auctex? They don't actually require old versions but they state just the minimum version they need, and in effect the current version would be installed. That is, you couldn't define a package that depends on auctex => 11.87 but smaller than 13. >> I guess there's also some way to teach package.el that it should assume >> some package is already installed in order to stop it from installing >> another version due to dependencies but I don't know it from the top of >> my head. > > I recall we discussed that somehow in the past (and I did not put the > conclusion in my remember.org file sigh) Yeah, I think we've talked about that. Bye, Tassilo