From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)? Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 23:25:59 +0000 Message-ID: <87lf4bapo8.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87v93gfusa.fsf@yahoo.com> <87y28ctpuo.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34332"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Po Lu , Emacs-devel@gnu.org, =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec To: Hongyi Zhao Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 05 01:27:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMf48-0008iA-GE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 01:27:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34934 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMf47-000442-7b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 19:27:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMf33-0002Zt-Nv for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 19:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:43155) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMf2z-0004BO-2T for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2021 19:26:09 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E478B240026 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 01:26:00 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1630797960; bh=z0D4psd6GIdbJAScme+6uNAtS+yE52Z5PcRapjIBqVQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=XRhOxHtKaWXAksh9UJl9LUfXrvUOVuTehlcDFj7fmwr57tfdzYGHZfNUcV9SGSHwG wkJrLGHgXEwXI6XCUv6Kt8nlPURZO9OBZVAfbx8mwr7qkz/WpIjb7oz+mrZclciIy0 W+GNQnNUFxBf7HUY/MTWV+UPRGa1Vw6w0aNKSuirmDLxgpK0gq6eXWVjbnb8QvhFis LU/6JD7V3jV6R9nPILj59G1LGGUE5gVgSHutUKnPiM3bW5KILvjBg1TumjNr3CIG14 GlUtPG8rBeY855uGw1Z8M7OoYyx7tlhGdgf89NL5WExTy0y4wWDGBDN+yON4D91WIb H3bAv3VxfkdLA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4H29lC6SYWz9rxP; Sun, 5 Sep 2021 01:25:59 +0200 (CEST) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: (Hongyi Zhao's message of "Sat, 4 Sep 2021 21:58:04 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273970 Archived-At: Hongyi Zhao writes: > Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but > fortunately it is a well documented process. It depends, I have certainly had times where sending a patch was easier than preparing a pull request. One thing that was mentioned in the other thread is that people are not used to patches on mailing lists. Sourcehut and specifically git-send-email.io came up with the clever idea of providing a testing list that nobody reads, just to see how their messages will end up looking like. As long as you don't have to worry that any small small mistake will have an army of greybeards shouting at you for messing up, I think people are more accepting of a different workflow (or that is at least my experience). -- Philip Kaludercic