From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Entering emojis Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:56:28 +0200 Message-ID: <87lf2dw8vn.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <87ilxi7531.fsf@gnus.org> <875yth7bjr.fsf@gnus.org> <871r4576ey.fsf@gnus.org> <87wnlx5rd4.fsf@gnus.org> <837ddxtimp.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7d15mvi.fsf@gnus.org> <831r45tgu3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32053"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 28 15:59:01 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mg5vo-0008AJ-Hn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:59:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48922 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg5vm-0001qp-LH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:58:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg5tV-0000EC-NX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]:42583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg5tS-0004aW-6u; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id v17so10341790wrv.9; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 06:56:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o7t24whUfSrp+kH/DMIdnb/D1UAonT7TegsGkuUDtjg=; b=hVUd677190ndvqOi4hxCVwxh8n42USkv6X85yCYOw0aBAA5WnPRLPAgAqQ9PO8weAl BBSQchWAZlt4a5WyY1PdS8CglNVWyHkE5yQKc66y57h3urIwWH3fsg2KdmMqs+RxwxGL DVqhkfS9CoIxTbT8Sr3Q+vkBMpAde24iIo4ZC1RIVkBJy3gc6fHM7UoIxNhkpFr5i9t7 xhP0W//5o4nkssKQecF36iWNUjGF/pVMGHn4psr4ocT4dVoNTKnNEWeePzQyqNOz9CUE 0XCcSWf9IPYMnjlWohp/6ZExGk4kW+VqiW1oSfzGZ2EQIBGammC4IqysL6PfwFQppcUO f0ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=o7t24whUfSrp+kH/DMIdnb/D1UAonT7TegsGkuUDtjg=; b=uaS2OZUz4zcVPQsEHlOe37WPOdHNSiyfry5r4d/01lcM9NHS6cOz/I4X7882zuzQPM Pc/MS9c6osauBrFdAFUMO+ZQOaROUCpkjxgyh+V886wtOeZtgz3AbTfHgcwaZD2kEyWr vbITS1jTrrId+93oA+FrvPwnNpK2kBq3fbQgxxrUmnTJevomh9HsPaJoX9Pka4kbu0rE IaBvNxnkYbI8nMac50t2Go25dIx9NzVM2N3Z4o+YcrCLVst93JBhV1PZVo00EWqWyfXt L8ZMAm7kviR7YhfcnHAirR25Xy/KIoXilS+5/X6UM/8qRUAAWnrJk1ZJATjBthdK6Zzl RsxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fawuXpvolDmFvJV6hS7Hsl+bqCdUUnVlMIU2WNfCYm3Iua9/G xCn1i7KPqNzlSD4VEJj8hkqzMHbd2ks= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfuLq0LOxZTA5zARe1WReuJwzBtEuIdHdVmxzR7LTtxoVTlqA2Je9IExyb6s9PORUF/48wAA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:128f:: with SMTP id f15mr5938825wrx.143.1635429390823; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 06:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f20sm3381197wmq.38.2021.10.28.06.56.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 06:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <831r45tgu3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:32:52 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42c; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278107 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:32:52 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen >> Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 14:56:17 +0200 >>=20 >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>=20 >> > Why do you need to call char-displayable-p in this case? >>=20 >> To see whether the font has support for the emoji (and not display i= t). Eli> Why not display them? They won't appear as Emoji if the font does= n't Eli> support them, but why does it matter for the feature we are Eli> discussing? I guess because if there=CA=BCs no font at all, you'll end up whatever glyphless-char-display is configured to do. I don=CA=BCt know how likely that is, don=CA=BCt most people have some maybe-ugly-but-functional font installed like Symbola? Robert --=20