From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On Contributing To Emacs Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 14:56:44 +0800 Message-ID: <87lf07hn0z.fsf@localhost> References: <83zgoopkwb.fsf@gnu.org> <874k6wsajh.fsf@posteo.net> <87o8536fry.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28084"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, "xenodasein--- via Emacs development discussions." To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 26 07:57:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n1NTF-00077e-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 07:57:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60456 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1NTD-0004RL-I1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 01:57:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42010) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1NRH-0002yc-Jg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 01:55:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::435] (port=46757 helo=mail-wr1-x435.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n1NRG-0005Cw-5G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2021 01:55:27 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id i22so25554061wrb.13 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 22:55:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=5ZElh/Qnhy2+ad4JoO3zyUSnRJIY+gWtsK4mlbpxZn0=; b=TbpM+1HRKWl/Aai9Az2cmRFAqzF2U2a7ez1xYIGPJNXtjSMfU8INC36wiaJvAKeIon E7yCxFfAkkmieRgQX3Uc5Vl3iekvNFU4lTHYxgHCYw8lIR8WNHpXgKxxNfj6X/tKTeDz Kq0/fbxHVQN4a1lIfIj3HGqXM2j+gnpWmmIuCSG8L8SZASKOlgsz7iwOjAHMnJSgHhps Cnz4eYDukiJtTC5hzV+fvH68/lkJ9hd8dNSao6k7XiAY9OyV+pcWe8kEmf5j73G+n/hR DbCmjid8XxS1S89Mn4kdNirEJEnswuQG8LBEg1k/irp+x9UBoxRdsYAfSZv+w8sUDOiL kdKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=5ZElh/Qnhy2+ad4JoO3zyUSnRJIY+gWtsK4mlbpxZn0=; b=mcmI/yPd74d7Jgly1HuwMZLSwvM495ofLnN4m2E6H5k2GmfmAZvwmgmdCaL45FQfx0 nC813nMUkkQRFRRJyXin4VpBv1i9nTH2A5QKk/1p8uwLVxpnjmSsf7VKLx4Bi/A0YK8j q9sJF7yKdwTh3yguFWBKrqSj5qJro+E26s1XYWEvI4YaxCyqI2xNfzD5N3NQeKxcsLxR r+M5IlxxvnTKkl4URMtBoaGJirIEniSFq4XRe+rg2kdBe3MIwkaVic5BU5kSrTSRxXbX x2nSnHXfOFXtBWGvQ09y4eLX7Gy91vSDh1dMIDKNPiaSwD5Z902pbdGAisUo+fM4sQKr dIRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530b84nyOcfGoc9j4tMhGrJTRliEG6Xk2M8/eskHfvEXQj1fwIsB bposNOvwn2ABlaeam3WcSb0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEOxhb5YEbjbu09fpyPE2tGCaj+TPZ//W5rFRDe9jHZY4KC/0ozHC5/1dr+zNBI1MGkVK/6A== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:456a:: with SMTP id a10mr9233577wrc.670.1640501724729; Sat, 25 Dec 2021 22:55:24 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([91.210.107.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i8sm12611938wmq.4.2021.12.25.22.55.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 25 Dec 2021 22:55:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87o8536fry.fsf@yahoo.com> X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::435 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::435; envelope-from=yantar92@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x435.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283260 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Apart from installing packages in such a haphazard fashion, I really > don't see what else straight.el does better than package.el. I do see some advantages: 1. Ability to review actual changes (commits) made in a package since last update 2. Ability to maintain a personal set of patches/changes to a package while still being able to update to the latest version. Best, Ihor