From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SOLVED (magic?)] Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 09:47:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87leuaxmg4.fsf@gmail.com> References: <871qxbdulc.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87k0b2tkg1.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87zgjx4qhs.fsf@gmail.com> <87bkwcgmr3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87sfpo3xai.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6bsw0pc.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87mtfs2ev9.fsf@gmail.com> <874k20vuy4.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <87ilqf2j92.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6bpsxxk.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <874k1x7qkw.fsf@gmail.com> <875yljjdvg.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> <87pmjrgjpy.fsf_-_@mat.ucm.es> <87tu91yhb6.fsf@gmail.com> <874k0y477t.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34789"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 06 09:50:54 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ny7Vl-0008pd-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 09:50:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59020 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ny7Vk-0006gq-Rj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 03:50:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52474) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ny7Sk-0004Nr-LI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 03:47:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]:44900) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ny7Si-0005mn-Mf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 03:47:46 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id q15so10650791wrc.11 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:47:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9ez9luf5O6mvXqWIQoIuCXc0WIzgNLa83o+oigFvLog=; b=iF6L2GBRJZlYK+mm9ZyHqLjAG+4kH8jJb5cqWgUTQm+vSK8tryPbJUPzkiyWGksFxU H+cI+YBKS84yyU2PUVZVD90dx4XqQTWfAO1AhUjMfcTOeX7+SCWw1MtVVrFHxOuD+sYA 0wAGXy619w+eQuAGIl2J9/LCnywNBUJ5lJhMo7b6k5w4Q/7BfweWwgYvU5wugcN+Qlds noRqnqiScEqj22gk2RQTqDMZuZCLe7ylPDQ3dALpLKz+6IIP0KJN6F9HEBnQf54mVY3n Jo0nWOSLkKyjbOXe8Ds8Jl/XmlFXRmrPylm7lTCBOIV3QGOn5dXJWW5/l6rkMPJDxtpg ALvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list :date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9ez9luf5O6mvXqWIQoIuCXc0WIzgNLa83o+oigFvLog=; b=UYp1sWU96NCEXHQozsj27W1Fd1BwCK4nH2VWh3xWAGWE9vaJfcGVUnnqWnxD3PWOrJ tlGocjqWf0dMy7vqkgAwuIRLgzTjpTQkr3d2t3xU44T9KxQeU+L5kbzMfW81Ad+lxQcd FgWJeDuT/nJ4GvatVKLewRKQpmkKfjQ4IaKPblNli+TIjxOuX3VxP8Ki5L6XCEBS3UrP +BbotiWyshWY8E/lzSuQxhvzIrCTBRxU4FwKzkqUd93nl2EJMnBZJwmb1hgb6B8IswJy jaRXOCEt5XIjHTDwb/+T7ZUitcn3kZgGzVZYcw+url5X7hzf0sGgy3VI6iCFAVhbkARB Lc/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53157E1UQTvabc62Ex79H9hZtg/UKqJHLxT165aiQC8PALwyTZ1b 7VNtjBxi6J4ixZWhgNShtrMpPtM7mg4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxNguQ80sOJHhMTL2TsahyWfm2rPrYLvAd+/vsVQd5X7Sz2a8tWlNCnfLcW6AmWU6HKbPc3wQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5584:0:b0:210:316e:fdc4 with SMTP id i4-20020a5d5584000000b00210316efdc4mr20112066wrv.33.1654501662006; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:8495:bb9e:c4b6:bac]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j3-20020a5d4643000000b002103a7c5c91sm14163666wrs.43.2022.06.06.00.47.40 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <874k0y477t.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (Uwe Brauer's message of "Mon, 06 Jun 2022 08:49:26 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42b; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42b.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290771 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 06 Jun 2022 08:49:26 +0200, Uwe Brauer said: Uwe> Well, you are not going to belive, it but after makeing the follow= ing minor change: Uwe> machine smtp.gmail.com login oub.oub.oub@gmail.com port 587 passwo= rd XXXXX Uwe> machine imap.gmail.com login oub.oub.oub password XXXX port imaps >> You made the 'machine' value match your nnimap-address? That seems >> sensible. Uwe> Well this is not the end of the story, although it worked it screw= ed up Uwe> other gmail accounts I access. So the final solution was this=20 Uwe> machine gmail login oub.oub.oub@gmail.com password YYYY port imaps Uwe> machine smtp.gmail.com login oub.oub.oub@gmail.com port 587 passwo= rd YYYY Uwe> machine User2 login user2@gmail.com password XXXX port imaps Uwe> machine User2 login user2@gmail.com port 587 password XXXX Uwe> And I am still not sure whether this is the best solution, since it Uwe> looks a bit incoherent. (info "(auth) Multiple GMail accounts with Gnus") recommends keying off the name of the secondary server only, not the nnimap-address. >> It sounds more like we need to document better that .authinfo entries >> can sometimes be cached, so `auth-source-forget-all-cached' might ne= ed >> to be called when messing with it (it=CA=BCs currently described in = the >> 'help for developers' section). Uwe> Oh, I did not know even about the `auth-source-forget-all-cached' Uwe> function. Since I restarted emacs, may the cache was the source of= my problems!? It=CA=BCs possible. Would it have helped you if there had been a reference to that part of the documentation somewhere else in the auth-source manual? Robert --=20