From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Thoughts on replacing macros with static inline functions Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:27:09 +0800 Message-ID: <87leo8eq0y.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <83r0y4idy8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34460"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Richard Stallman , xenodasein@tutanota.de, Eli Zaretskii , pappasbrent@knights.ucf.edu To: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 18 07:28:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ovurE-0008lH-HD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:28:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovuqm-0001D5-Pw; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 01:27:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovuqk-0001Cv-CL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 01:27:42 -0500 Original-Received: from sonic311-25.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.188.206]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ovuqU-0005Xz-Gh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 01:27:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1668752842; bh=kwPiL1QIyj0VXE+e5rIjpmdYIOf9TH1b43mwPvw8bQc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=K+DynZpWK05cner2leIp7yzMHl/z7bxeCiFh/ERFgKHK3nZYrlrTutCDI20bCKgFJdPdPhy+tdj9Y8HVpMKBm4Z7JY1liDitY1PnyP1xwwMM7PaLfVz5ZUU7F4aN4wFBA7cZZ7DZqLfnJFxjeP4/p1RxwQhlEF4gE+aUJKQLlKgfYv/MKLbwKYsD+AzvB5kjBeD3alxn4vTiRtgyGqjNfGqwdzczlRK/6ryRbmgUckHdr6dBo49pruoKRWW/LAUoOkInXm+6NGRbDcVWMLt5UkilZ6Sw9vMw1JsHG60wNk9OJKlkGxhpVJO1dYNiliYDqnSv/ijLZfYitljbGo4aGg== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1668752842; bh=paojaT+7GWcBFT83xQy0uCsNa22XRbbpmjUNSv4Dcx5=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=qH/F3/rBXZEbm1Ts+CfBD1/gR289pRYEIh4j8gQVM8ixvOjlb4bV947Pw5TPNryHoKngDhMY4LmbayZHpr0wlY/i0rL4i9jfqELibeqC5cY/X45TKJHAl7IQvlzrg384Q7UJoy2cAVwvT12SGkrS2WxBDdLW93yEwEOAO7A7SvWw1Z5NZgsj4zxpA9wROnd6OULGwvXVjhM1o++9PLtXoUua74K7VatJqNiP8YsFiNnbhagTxXdujHYmiyiqYLTBbllYAwY1c9TIo5e7GAyNmMJZCdbEah8PXVpUzPebyu6CWsN2MYqpqx8l6DLq6fR9UKGPGv8IRe7fshqwEDs9+w== X-YMail-OSG: oVwdLooVM1lyqfUkpuH0LREfwh6E8zayBsmziEFJ_zCaSDW756dUNicORvv5PEi RsQFM4lQq1ZRiJBj3AoDwnMIeMFYlIx.KM2PfSxQhTsudM.vnXfH5PQgUbDYT2m5P23RowcCooQE 8BNw51IqslT8qPnG9j62YUGXivhASHa19rL94SwRDiM62di.kcS_ejCGdBVZWfQankx1AlluGGhf roiDUyFGYuG_aixBIzeqyRLa5Dr0pIpQQE9cHAIzn3yspGv2ynMQcwwabvrncHrvbMxbFCWf3y9b vSM3wihCjpEqn81KBDWiPld_kuoydwpwDFr6ej_deXEB.d96zG1QESQX5.Ul_txg20zaNUs4RUIm h8JFoJJFkvsvXE9o712e3BG2jYgjudhW7NuYjlaJMy8VMo_hKUA65WNg9hZh9kS7_ewNHOcY6eJJ ayfmybMBT2zZSNsoIHR5W4GBR3m5OzP8y3UIwg6a2maE5yFA5GbCIiqqNKdfvs02wcHEn0MzzKMw oTq3gyKW9JlMA_O2C3eFy7HJnT.aAdf46OzUUNCSfiMbk6Vio2H_fudJsWbHkVRAUd.EhzvywxyW GEdbHt.MdRDUsT9UrMiw1H0BhzvzW14ZbLOxfM43lOAKQwVGkST64Zwj8ubRpIhEZzlsHHsFpx0t yGa4ZzV4A3X9mqEzpzwiMrUN691JsSYsWSttVfOAromOz7eJ2.s4pbvLtRlaAsItpJy7DGjNGt62 mWgRBlmkPV_62O.SYSiWCE.sXLbZHqFgLAhCAMPX7r_VC2y7JSteYl.QzNm6wdJ0QpTR3iOmvoWg Vvvasr7j1V9KFU4MKjLBopEFyA3ui9OZWvIWWh4Ief X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic311.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:27:22 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--production-sg3-6c8895b545-qz6cd (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 6bcf7c846c64ad1a49467f3eb38d367f; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:27:16 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (xenodasein's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2022 07:19:45 +0100 (CET)") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.20863 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.163.188.206; envelope-from=luangruo@yahoo.com; helo=sonic311-25.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300083 Archived-At: xenodasein--- via "Emacs development discussions." writes: > Why do you not consider __attribute__((always_inline)) an improvement > over macros where applicable? And exactly where is __attribute__((always_inline)) present? Only on GCC, right? What about Sun C, and other C99 compilers? And how is an additional function an improvement over extremely trivial macros, like these: #define XM_DRAG_REASON(originator, code) ((code) | ((originator) << 7)) #define XM_DRAG_REASON_ORIGINATOR(reason) (((reason) & 0x80) ? 1 : 0) #define XM_DRAG_REASON_CODE(reason) ((reason) & 0x7f) ?