From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Protesilaos Stavrou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] externals/denote 51bd02b95c 1/2: Add initial version of 'denote-rename-buffer' extension Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 14:15:02 +0300 Message-ID: <87leh8r9l5.fsf@protesilaos.com> References: <168526066293.9832.17189979431838421656@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20230528075743.4D45AC22A3C@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87fs7gzpf5.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35861"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Ruijie Yu To: Philip Kaludercic , "Ruijie Yu via Emacs development discussions." Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 28 13:16:06 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q3ENa-0009Ab-6q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 13:16:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3EMk-00046j-S7; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:15:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3EMg-00046O-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:15:11 -0400 Original-Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3EMe-0005eu-If for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 07:15:10 -0400 X-GND-Sasl: info@protesilaos.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protesilaos.com; s=gm1; t=1685272505; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NTDlXuHWOyz9Okil5py1LY65GKVr3FrU5JHdob8K3VM=; b=H39SwzQNsucfA29rBIVSMcCNZtdjmwlTopMRYeqQDaHV1dhNZydfFEF7M4WPj2qZjXxH0J Li9+HXcBajXjtLRlslOifO8BC7lwFWRpAj0/uC2HrbCEzr2tmNXgC4EICOtXOtNLoB4T/u ZLQTMYv8XDNvapKI5/qNzqydmduFAfrUM2b8dpba+hGbIeM7T/nXcY8PFgifMnR0TQw3cF YI4xQ1pD6XsL8AaBxnaXUL3G3S7q+KTsHskuZIx5qhkt64kVvkX1Z2ehOfFHst+ef1bTVC xG4j6aADVbukQmZMfY+VQWJYSsfL9mrF2DuWqOyVU7RH+UipxogmFW9J6GqV0g== X-GND-Sasl: info@protesilaos.com X-GND-Sasl: info@protesilaos.com Original-Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2ECA060002; Sun, 28 May 2023 11:15:03 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87fs7gzpf5.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: none client-ip=217.70.183.195; envelope-from=info@protesilaos.com; helo=relay3-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:306372 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 11:05:50 +0000 > > Ruijie Yu via "Emacs development discussions." > writes: > [... 20 lines elided] >> I'm curious, should GNU elpa packages be considered part of Emacs or >> not? I have previously contributed to pyim, a GNU elpa package, whose >> maintainer asked me whether I had FSF CA before including my proposed >> changes, and whose package header says it is part of Emacs. > > I believe this is a mistake, the package is part of the GNU ELPA > repository, where all packages are regarded to be part of GNU Emacs. It > might be that Prot used a template to generate this file, and that the > template defaulted to "... is not a part ...". I didn't know this. To my mind, the modus-themes are "part of Emacs". The rest have copyright assigned to the FSF and, as such, "could be part of Emacs". I am happy to change this in all my packages. -- Protesilaos Stavrou https://protesilaos.com