Re: master 15afa72460b: Fix 'script-representative-chars' for the 'han' script

[Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2024 17:27:27 +0800
>> 
>> > --- a/lisp/international/fontset.el
>> > +++ b/lisp/international/fontset.el
>> > @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@
>> >  	(kana #x304B)
>> >  	(bopomofo #x3105)
>> >  	(kanbun #x319D)
>> > -	(han #x2e90 #x2f00 #x3010 #x3200 #x3300 #x3400 #x31c0 #x4e10
>> > -             #x5B57 #xfe30 #xf900)
>> > +	(han #x2e90 #x2f00 #x3200 #x3300 #x3400 #x4e10 #x5B57 #xfe30 #xf900)
>> 
>> Someone reports that this set of characters still does not enable the
>> detection of WenQuanYi Micro Hei, which is certainly complete enough to
>> display all Han text that will be encountered in practice.  U+2E90,
>> U+2F00, U+3300 and U+3400 are absent from this font, and quite
>> reasonably so, since they are freestanding radicals, Kana, which belong
>> in the entry for kana rather than han, or obsolete.
>
> On what system did that happen?

Not "what system", "which font": WenQuanYi Micro Hei, one of the better
free Han fonts.

> And I don't understand why you say these characters are Kana, this
> page disagrees:
>
>   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangxi_radical

That's U+2E90.  U+3300 is Kana, according to Scripts.txt:

3300..3357    ; Katakana # So  [88] SQUARE APAATO..SQUARE WATTO