From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.mail.mew.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: [mew-int 01589] Re: windows 1252 Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:23:23 +0900 Organization: The XEmacs Project Sender: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Message-ID: <87k76gwt2c.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <20031031.213916.222075160.kazu@iijlab.net> <2719-Sat01Nov2003173635+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <87llqzuvaj.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <20031104.111334.60445673.kazu@iijlab.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1067927043 20109 80.91.224.253 (4 Nov 2003 06:24:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 06:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kazu Yamamoto (~~~~) , mew-int@mew.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: mew-int-return-1589-gmmg-mew-int=m.gmane.org@mew.org Tue Nov 04 07:24:00 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from mew2.iijlab.net ([202.232.15.102]) by deer.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGubf-0005Xm-00 for ; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 07:24:00 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 20811 invoked by uid 7800); 4 Nov 2003 06:23:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact mew-int-help@mew.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: Original-Received: (qmail 20784 invoked from network); 4 Nov 2003 06:23:28 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp) (130.158.98.109) by 202.232.15.102 with SMTP; 4 Nov 2003 06:23:28 -0000 Original-Received: from steve by tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AGub5-0000CC-00; Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:23:23 +0900 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "04 Nov 2003 07:55:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, linux) X-ML-Name: mew-int X-Mail-Count: 01589 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.mail.mew.general:514 gmane.emacs.devel:17677 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:17677 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:13:34 +0900 (JST) > From: Kazu Yamamoto (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=) > (2) Co-exist of Emacs and XEmacs. > > The 'emacs-mule coding-system is not appropriate since XEmacs > has a different internal representation from Emacs'one. Note > Emacsen use different 'emacs-mule coding-system among > versions. > > The one-and-only coding-system which, I found, meets the requirements > above is 'ctext. Eli> In that case, extending ctext to handle the problem we were Eli> discussing in this thread would not be a good idea: IIRC, Eli> XEmacs doesn't support extended segments, and non-MULE Eli> Emacsen certainly don't. Or am I missing something? Use of extended segments in this way is not an extension of ctext; it's exactly what they are designed for. True, XEmacs doesn't support them properly yet, but that's XEmacs's problem; we should and will support them. But I would oppose adding special-case support (eg, using private character sets or an alternative use of DOCS) to XEmacs. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.