From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Todays exercise of sanity (or does "see" really match "not"?) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:19:32 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87k6nyz8xn.fsf@jurta.org> References: <002301c52e18$c9b014a0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <200503211349.j2LDnxX12741@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <003401c52e20$d6f79c70$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <87hdj4vppf.fsf@jurta.org> <87br9begh1.fsf@jurta.org> <877jjy4ij3.fsf@jurta.org> <200503231419.j2NEJcL00651@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111592545 21565 80.91.229.2 (23 Mar 2005 15:42:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 16:42:25 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DE7nG-0002AM-UK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:29:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DE84n-0002eE-4T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:47:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DE849-0002bv-PR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:46:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DE843-0002X4-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:46:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DE842-0002Uz-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:46:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.98] (helo=MXR-8.estpak.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DE7lr-00054z-Vl; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:27:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-34-194-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.34.194]) by MXR-8.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9F749DE4; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:27:40 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-Reply-To: <200503231419.j2NEJcL00651@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:19:38 -0600 (CST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35048 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35048 Luc Teirlinck writes: > Just to make sure: did you check that your patch works correctly when > Info-hide-note-references is nil, where `not' _should_ match `*Note'? > Personally, I have not had the time to follow this thread completely, > but at first view, nothing in this seem like a bug in any search > function to me. To me, it seems like an obvious bug in > Info-hide-note-references; it abuses the display property for editing > purposes. It is easy to add a test for Info-hide-note-references, but I think it would be more convenient to skip the `*Note ' tag even when it is visible. Searching for "not" is too tiresome when search stops at every cross reference. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/