From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai@emptydomain.de (Kai =?iso-8859-15?Q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: org-mode: compatibility with viper, cua, and Emacs in general Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:59:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87k6ny5uqf.fsf@emptydomain.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111586632 32336 80.91.229.2 (23 Mar 2005 14:03:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 15:03:52 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DE6SJ-0007yu-PT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:03:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DE6jp-0006dW-59 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:21:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DE6hj-0005mP-3I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:19:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DE6hU-0005cR-SJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:19:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DE6hU-0005ZE-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:19:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1DE6PJ-0005pH-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:00:26 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DE6Mk-00078P-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:57:47 +0100 Original-Received: from p3ee248c8.dip.t-dialin.net ([62.226.72.200]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:57:46 +0100 Original-Received: from kai by p3ee248c8.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:57:46 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p3ee248c8.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) Cancel-Lock: sha1:+quU1K9GIfcChb3POIslcy7vy6o= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35043 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35043 First of all, let me say that org-mode is a way cool thing! The following are minor issues, really. org-mode has a number of keybindings on S-, but CUA mode uses S-. IMHO it would be useful to think of other bindings. (There are bindings for S-, S-, S- and S-, at least.) org-mode binds C- to move the current line down, but Emacs generally binds this to forward-paragraph. IMVHO the two behaviors are too different to match well: the general binding is a movement command, the org mode binding changes the text. org-mode does not play ball with viper: when in viper's command mode, RET does not advance to the beginning of the next line but rather inserts a newline into the text. Thoughts? Kai