From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: `hard-newline' changes trigger format=flowed in Gnus
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:56:54 -0500
Message-ID: <87k6er6m9l.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
References: <v94q5v9oga.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133308630 21525 80.91.229.2 (29 Nov 2005 23:57:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:57:10 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 00:57:09 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EhFKZ-0000VD-Fy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:56:15 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EhFKY-0000BY-3F
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:56:14 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EhFKK-0000AE-FW
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:56:00 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EhFKI-00009b-C3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:55:59 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhFKI-00009Y-9N
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:55:58 -0500
Original-Received: from [18.19.6.82] (helo=localhost.localdomain)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EhFKI-0006Pz-Cu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:55:58 -0500
Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A648D1208AF; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:56:54 -0500 (EST)
Original-To: Emacs development <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <v94q5v9oga.fsf@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> (Reiner Steib's
	message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:41:25 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46786 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:61437
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/46786>

Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc> writes:

> the changes related to `hard-newline' seem to provoke undesired
> behavior in Gnus.

I found out that it's not necessary to use hard-newline in
those places after all.  I've reverted the 2005-11-29 changes to 
mailheader.el

Thanks.