From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexbind Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:31:35 +0900 Message-ID: <87k5kjgzag.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <857igj1myh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85k5kjz9ox.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204587224 7872 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2008 23:33:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 23:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , rms@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 04 00:34:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWKAa-0001Yr-ST for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:34:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWKA3-0000lc-Gf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:33:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWK8Z-0007CU-Dj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:32:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWK8V-00076D-PC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWK8V-00075o-E9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:31:59 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp12.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.74]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWK8C-0001tT-FM; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:31:41 -0500 Original-Received: from 203-216-103-146.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.103.146] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp12.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1JWK88-0000Eb-D0; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:31:36 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2BA52FF7; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:31:35 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <85k5kjz9ox.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:09:34 +0100") Original-Lines: 10 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91258 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > It does not look pretty in the source. Are function parameters let or > lexical-let to their values in lexbind? lexically-bound (presuming the source file is tagged "lexically-bound"). -Miles -- Accord, n. Harmony.