From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Visual line movement inconsistency Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:35:38 +0200 Message-ID: <87k5dyh5x1.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> References: <874p55z20j.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87prnsmywh.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87vdxkghaw.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <8763pjkgtk.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87prnrheq1.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87tzd3idj0.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220110593 30795 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2008 15:36:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 30 17:37:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZSVa-00074X-R5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:37:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59626 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZSUc-000756-5a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZSUX-000726-AH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:35:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZSUV-0006yz-Iq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:35:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37228 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZSUV-0006yq-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:35:55 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.fullrate.dk ([89.150.129.5]:53348 helo=dns2.fullrate.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZSUO-0000uF-CW; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 11:35:48 -0400 Original-Received: from kfs-lx.rd.rdm.cua.dk (unknown [90.184.173.152]) by dns2.fullrate.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 40CB05D3F4; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:35:38 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87tzd3idj0.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (Miles Bader's message of "Sat\, 30 Aug 2008 08\:53\:39 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 6.x (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103270 Archived-At: Miles Bader writes: > However that's mainly useful for the "very long word" wrapping case you > mention, and that's a pretty rare occurance, so it doesn't seem like a > particularly critical thing. If someone decides to put in the time to > implement it, great; otherwise, whatever. I haven't had time to check how the latest word wrap works, but if there is a wrap-margin-min which defines the minimum column where word wrapping is allowed, long words which start before that margin would be continued rather than wrapped - and in that case the fringe indicators would also make sense. -- Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk