From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Sieger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Failed to compile from last bzr repo Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:41:10 -0400 Message-ID: <87k4f87lk9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87vcyugxgs.fsf@gnu.org> <87wrjab38x.fsf@gmail.com> <83d3l1x6i6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302018325 5882 80.91.229.12 (5 Apr 2011 15:45:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:45:25 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 05 17:45:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q78RU-0000e9-1R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:45:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56903 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q78RT-0002Nj-K1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:45:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41961 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q78RM-0002N4-AG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:45:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q78RK-0000NU-Si for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:45:12 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:39732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q78RK-0000NI-Lj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q78RF-0000U9-Kd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:45:05 +0200 Original-Received: from pool-151-205-186-114.ny325.east.verizon.net ([151.205.186.114]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:45:05 +0200 Original-Received: from sean.sieger by pool-151-205-186-114.ny325.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:45:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-151-205-186-114.ny325.east.verizon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:SghoLVcFS6x/eu0R4jUdwO9DGYo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138179 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> takes just a tiny bit loner (especially with -O0 and all assertions >> enabled). > Because of it being slower during all the .el compilations, you mean? > I regularly build both -O2 --enable-checking and -O0 --enable-checking > and I haven't seen much difference, but now I'm curious. I don't know, to tell you the truth: I always compile with -O0, unions, and all assertions I can think of enabled. And I tend to find it significantly slower than the rare few times that I do a test build with all default settings. But I never bothered to measure it. Where do you find the configure information that you and Juanma are discussing? I've poked around, but I haven't found anything beyond configure --help. The INSTALL files don't say, right? The assertions, CFLAGs and so on, where are they listed?