From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs with Cocoa/GNUstep Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:15:29 +0200 Organization: Informatimago Message-ID: <87k4egba8u.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> References: <1303864750.11832.3.camel@german-desktop> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303878917 16864 80.91.229.12 (27 Apr 2011 04:35:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 04:35:17 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 27 06:35:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEwT1-0002t2-Ne for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:35:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60396 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEwT1-00025F-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:35:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33789) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEwSy-00021Y-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:35:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEwSx-0002Es-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:35:08 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60854) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEwSx-0002EA-6B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEwSv-0002pS-HB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:35:05 +0200 Original-Received: from 81.202.16.46.dyn.user.ono.com ([81.202.16.46]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:35:05 +0200 Original-Received: from pjb by 81.202.16.46.dyn.user.ono.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:35:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.202.16.46.dyn.user.ono.com Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oElEQVR4nK3OsRHCMAwF0O8YQufUNIQRGIAja9CxSA55AxZgFO4coMgYrEDDQZWPIlNAjwq9 033pbOBPtbXuB6PKNBn5gZkhGa86Z4x2wE67O+06WxGD/HCOGR0deY3f9Ijwwt7rNGNf6Oac l/GuZTF1wFGKiYYHKSFAkjIo1b6sCYS1sVmFhhhahKQssRjRT90ITWUk6vvK3RsPGs+M1RuR mV+hO/VvFAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Accept-Language: fr, es, en User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NmQ4ZWUzODViYWYzZGUzM2E3ODdhMmExY2FmMmVjNGI2MmVkMmVlNA== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138834 Archived-At: Germán Arias writes: > Hi, I'm trying to run emacs with GNUstep, but it seems to be totally > broken. So my question is if someone is running emacs with Cocoa and if > it works fine. Because with latest gnustep packages don't work (compile > but can't run). And after the last update in file configure.in, the > class nsmenu.m can't compile. So I can guess there isn't testing in > GNUstep/Cocoa. Is just a question before trying to get working emacs > with gnustep. Thanks. Emacs works very well in MacOSX: http://emacsformacosx.com/ I don't know about gnustep, it's been a long time. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.