From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Inefficiency in Bgotoifnil byte-code instruction Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 13:12:12 -0600 Message-ID: <87k3yckaur.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <87k3yq2htz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87y5n2vupa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87wr2kvr6g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87ipe4vjy1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341861147 25328 80.91.229.3 (9 Jul 2012 19:12:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 19:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mohamed Ben-Ahssene , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 09 21:12:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SoJNe-0006ve-9c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:12:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60231 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoJNd-0006rH-9G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:12:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoJNa-0006qx-Eq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoJNY-000268-P7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SoJNY-00025x-H8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:12:16 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q69JCEYo021367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:12:14 -0400 Original-Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q69JCCwp029576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 15:12:13 -0400 X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:02:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151506 Archived-At: Stefan> Yes, as I said, I think it's OK. How do you feel about this ChangeLog entry? +2012-07-09 Tom Tromey + + * bytecode.c (BYTE_CODE_THREADED): New define. + (BYTE_CODES): New define. Replaces all old byte-code defines. + (enum byte_code_op): New. + (CASE, NEXT, FIRST, CASE_DEFAULT, CASE_ABORT): New defines. + (exec_byte_code): Use new defines. I wasn't sure if you wanted me to spell out all the Bmumble defines that were replaced. Tom