From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: eww Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:34:23 -0600 Message-ID: <87k3lra3o0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> References: <87d2rkb1pi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371566074 13641 80.91.229.3 (18 Jun 2013 14:34:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 18 16:34:35 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UowzS-0005Uz-LO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:34:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47414 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UowzR-0006Uc-RN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:34:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UowzM-0006TE-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:34:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UowzK-0007Tz-RS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:34:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:65527) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UowzK-0007Tk-JG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:34:26 -0400 Original-Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5IEYPTS008618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:34:25 -0400 Original-Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-102.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.102]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r5IEYNWX000340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:34:24 -0400 X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:23:02 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 10.5.11.12 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160570 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:83363 Archived-At: Lars> Heh. This is because the manual uses the
,
and
tags, Lars> which I didn't even know existed. :-) Lars> I've now added support for this. Thanks. On the same node in the gdb manual, on an 80-column terminal, some of the paragraph wrap improperly. E.g., shr renders one as: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D When you are debugging a program, it is not unusual to realize that you have gone too far, and some event of interest has already happened. If the target environment supports it, gdb can allow you to =E2=80=9Crewind=E2=80=9D the = program by running i\ t backward. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D If you have 80 columns, the "it" at the end of the 3rd line is split in the middle. Can shr not use word-wrap? Anyhow, the wrapping code is complicated & spread out enough that I didn't look into it. Tom