From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: info files Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 19:37:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87k3eurt6j.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <87zjnrtusr.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> <87eh53nfpb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <52B92093.3030908@cs.ucla.edu> <87zjnqn4ib.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <52B9CC2E.80202@cs.ucla.edu> <8338li6rqw.fsf@gnu.org> <87ob46rtnh.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387910659 3814 80.91.229.3 (24 Dec 2013 18:44:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 18:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 24 19:44:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VvWxt-0007kJ-O5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 19:44:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40098 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvWxt-0003K2-9p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:44:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41413) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvWxk-0003It-Ih for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:44:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvWxe-0000p5-Ed for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:44:16 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:38397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VvWxe-0000oh-87; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 13:44:10 -0500 Original-Received: from 37.253.110.173.tmi.telenormobil.no ([37.253.110.173] helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VvWxN-00008Q-6L; Tue, 24 Dec 2013 19:43:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87ob46rtnh.fsf@building.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 24 Dec 2013 19:27:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1VvWxN-00008Q-6L MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1388515433.76651@deLOJqbOnIz9iaAfMWfJWw X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166844 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > How did they manage to make makeinfo so much slower? Oh, they rewrote it in Perl. :-/ I compared building a smaller manual with Emacs compared to makeinfo: [larsi@building texi]$ time emacs -batch -q -no-site-file -l ./infohack.el -f batch-makeinfo emacs-mime.texi real 0m1.567s user 0m1.383s sys 0m0.141s [larsi@building texi]$ time makeinfo emacs-mime.texi real 0m2.885s user 0m2.792s sys 0m0.058s So Emacs is now 2x faster than makeinfo. But it seems to lack some functionality: @indicateurl is not handled by texinfo -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/