From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Obscure error/warning/information message from git pull Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:10:03 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <87k32vldec.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <20141114120604.GA3859@acm.acm> <87389mkjwo.fsf@thinkpad-t440p.tsdh.org> <20141114141434.GM3565@embecosm.com> <20141114180521.GA3168@acm.acm> <87h9y1mwxl.fsf@igel.home> <20141114200957.GC3168@acm.acm> <87y4rc5k2u.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20141115214521.GC3378@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416129053 23333 80.91.229.3 (16 Nov 2014 09:10:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 09:10:53 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 16 10:10:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpvr3-0002xq-Tb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:10:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43252 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpvr3-0001ny-D9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 04:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpvqh-0001nr-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 04:10:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpvqc-0004M7-7h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 04:10:23 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34167) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xpvqc-0004M3-1a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 04:10:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XpvqY-0002pk-L7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:10:14 +0100 Original-Received: from x2f516dd.dyn.telefonica.de ([2.245.22.221]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:10:14 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by x2f516dd.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:10:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: x2f516dd.dyn.telefonica.de X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:IE8oUqEeWf+4ALxIKTVT93x5Tn0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177286 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: > Hello, Florian. > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 08:40:09PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Alan Mackenzie: > >> > This doesn't work very well. It prints out the information for the first >> > commit that is displayed, but no more. This feels like a git bug. > >> Git does not record the branch on which a commit was made. > > But as I understand it, the head of each branch is identified by a > pointer, and all previous commits are in a chain starting at this > pointer. So git should know which branch each commit is on. Why can it > not display this information? git log --source --all I might have mentioned this already. Like, half a dozen times. -- David Kastrup