From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:00:58 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87k32tkh1x.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87wq6uj5gt.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416236493 20626 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 15:01:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:01:33 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 16:01:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqNnx-0004Hq-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:01:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48281 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqNnx-0001dX-Fd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:01:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqNnL-0001Ox-6V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:00:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqNnF-0002Rt-8d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:00:47 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqNnE-0002Rj-K0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:00:40 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqNnD-0003vq-9R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:00:39 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:00:39 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:00:39 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3jzRru8setJgCZsmNVWxVDo8xbQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177415 Archived-At: On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:17:19 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Feature branch or emacs-24 please. It should be applicable to >>> emacs-24, and the maintainers have requested we work against emacs-24 in >>> those cases, forward-porting the changes into master. >> I don't think emacs-24 is supposed to receive new features, only bug >> fixes. SM> Indeed. I could consider including it in a 24.5 release because it's SM> a somewhat important issue, but it would have to be "obviously safe" SM> (in the sense of "won't break anything"). That sounds fairly unlikely. I don't know how complicated it will be internally, but I don't think it will endanger any existing functionality (except TLS connections, of course). The only reason for it in 24.x is to add reasonable certificate handling so we can turn on certificate verification by default. I don't think it can be done otherwise without seriously damaging the user experience. Would you rather not make those changes in 24.x? Ted