From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA policy Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:44:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87k2pqbuvx.fsf@petton.fr> References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87fv0labbf.fsf@web.de> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <22074.42230.156669.584780@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ziyoxvdp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k2psnzyh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuorz7n.fsf@gmail.com> <8337wfon3f.fsf@gnu.org> <56401834.8080402@yandex.ru> <83ziynma4s.fsf@gnu.org> <5640C6A0.5010709@yandex.ru> <83twovm9es.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447112709 18376 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2015 23:45:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 23:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: aaronecay@gmail.com, eliz@gnu.org, Stromeko@nexgo.de, dgutov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org, John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 00:44:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvw7M-0001fj-Qq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:44:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56479 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvw7M-0007V1-4Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:44:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59719) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvw77-0007Ut-G1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:44:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvw74-0004r7-84 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:44:41 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:40591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zvw74-0004qX-3Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:44:38 -0500 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD629204B3 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:44:37 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 18:44:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=QwPne5FJ1/tihzefQ0SuEr26Ap0=; b=ubg4k olq2HG2JEsGtzYAfcgNd7vaYLaf45a0OtZptcicnZLK5R3gLKLJtmH6gKRMdIKQw MMbbFW3sNM1I3DTcOeaZ/r19JjR73VWiZfwA8m416Z3GKh+f99BPNc4XNnVaVoN+ SR5n35d5PFXvuzARm9C6oo5EOF6Njq8xVPj29w= X-Sasl-enc: 7ttNtoxlbwwybR8KSHeKKpjl80mgCxRhJ12bamqxOL8g 1447112677 Original-Received: from blueberry (arennes-658-1-225-50.w92-139.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.139.114.50]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B80C26800F0; Mon, 9 Nov 2015 18:44:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193787 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Richard Stallman writes: > This plan seems good, overall, But in the specific case of stream.el > and seq.el, shouldn't they be maintained in the core? I don't see > stream.el in the sources I fetched, but seq.el is small, in emacs-lisp, > and it says Maintainer: emacs-devel. stream.el is currently in ELPA, which can make some sense, but regarding seq.el, I think it should really stay in the core. Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWQS/iAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQr9sH/0ogoLI4VGtISJWwb9FRgf3d JGwq7mLgib0DzNEwRay1eNI1qta17iG4MrNTirzQCQrmLQpxQzsj2QGHfRiwO6my nKe/i1Ot7Gf7txVFlzIqwVY7vCgZNRclqBmSxEgX3qqgtZfO/iNt9RoP2zMyezuc DmzZxmvQ4/Hkp/C6SZEpL4Zg4me61ahe8psAU/itnTv3HHg18g3adZ++IWHYj46s sQNy7RITdo3P/p4X302uMnI/XhjErGz0c8t9sqRC5PeSsinC17Nm3ciESoviHvYS aGS+tn2U8ElKeAKWU7D6xgL9urXehjtRjyt+5zK4Ad0KfS7x3taz5Z9NzpI6j/s= =BHiH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--