From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Remote temporary directory Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 16:45:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2g1lvc0.fsf@gmx.de> References: <837fch1vmw.fsf@gnu.org> <8536522f-fa3f-9fe0-63c0-262b8191b4a3@gmail.com> <83h9bdttxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87lh0ons06.fsf@gmx.de> <83r3afst6v.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2g7pfmx.fsf_-_@gmx.de> <83lh0nrrjs.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuqvxbo8.fsf@gmx.de> <83a8h3rnib.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8h3x81p.fsf@gmx.de> <87oa5g42v5.fsf@gmx.de> <87mvky2gmi.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1469976382 11014 80.91.229.8 (31 Jul 2016 14:46:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 14:46:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 31 16:46:09 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bTs0H-0002om-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 16:46:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39829 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTs0D-0004eZ-84 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTs07-0004eR-OU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:46:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTs04-0003zU-L1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:45:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:56747) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bTs04-0003zQ-An for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([79.195.2.175]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MegeC-1bewm10FTM-00OJPt; Sun, 31 Jul 2016 16:45:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 31 Jul 2016 10:19:03 -0400") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:yF0ubyKBJCAlkfK6LDSmnJ80deS/ru8hrvcX1LFd6VvuDZpuJIu Ww1O9fjTFCxrpdhPSW0MWDjSWGdRcFcusyvUDN7B6lDLDpvLtyoju3lFPcuPOScT5j8XPQO /ugxyynf+zvowB/KpMifbVbH386do459jU6TnwYkFxmKYfIah0Qc5dvLlbx0Kh3xUXi9acS 4lyejTvrtdlyMqz2CGXpA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:p6It6TlIpEU=:m6MKtcmmW0MibaBWE/eCEO CXOZetPWIuuNsqO6vmjxRTaTgKpcMLI/0nSyXTrZXiN8jpdff1Sp6/XEnCvUWETXzeq3bnUB2 iM3xOkEt5CrZ4cHh6BM6XE5TyTsulwGe47uK58T428SPCVuvlFT1WrQWy/rdizuqXrH38wyJi QqfUuDAsM9xM3QrijkLiitg8i49lgnifPqHfdcl30VAwmkAXNUCWCy9jRFSmAYhEl/u72CEGx 2W+RqLy1n+KZl/USXuDFOoS6wo10YhDUZWEiEqrAutCogzMiH+9MtkmHGcZNR/XLfrfFTZgHh gTtabfGhR8OsME3wzNW6E7/E3U0xnhnV2P7K/JKQOiF8r8ttNrRbfmzcS79J5i1LqEGN8XMeB 00LT3EtfrmDPMLYlGyxX0VxIxyjA0qkfTibhAEoXh+ciyAtRRqDdlfDxcWlpjY5AQ1VioRjYr KrDnrP2IL0UdU0wfUEvdL3ssuL0Wb4Ly7CGVtwU2ncbghL0CAx0UkuENtIJclyo4rNw0BXLQh TyrdRzqv0K3jh44Qx1ERROrUP6Pu3gGJNdMd6U6A5uHirGrW3Y32EXHWlT8MKJJN5jDLjQ5be R1Ck86nMWwS5xbTLwnUv478ClYgDaua3/Tv0M8Dguso1AJt3VG4Nr//ZsAPqBMzrLy0h6kKaR QaGN8LVz2f9vmW4Bk0V8bYG8GMcKSikrgo6YcuikYI6TZ9nzmloaJLXYQogmbtYAX1mgeQTBr AMNIZrBZQL2L89oKNvtlPj79wYGkj86kNjykVYqTCoT+Joe6S0Dw8pX+K6rarQvSFb6/UoXt X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206267 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Shall we add >> an optional argument SAVE-DIR-ONLY to `make-temp-file' / > ^^^^ > You mean safe ? Sure. >> `make-nearby-temp-file'? If non-nil, the checks above are performed. > > I don't know how to implement those checks in a robust way. It might be possible only in some cases. If it isn't possible to find such a safe directory, the function shall return nil, in case SAFE-DIR-ONLY is set and non-nil. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.