From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Huchler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concurrency, again Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:04:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2cwe4wl.fsf@jupiter.lan> References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <86k2dk77w6.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <9D64B8EA-DB52-413D-AE6A-264416C391F3@iotcl.com> <83int1g0s5.fsf@gnu.org> <83twckekqq.fsf@gnu.org> <83funkwfzf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477415163 8718 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2016 17:06:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:06:03 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 19:05:59 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5Aa-0000m3-Si for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:05:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56567 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5Ad-0008U3-9G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5AS-0008T9-OA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:05:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5AO-00020C-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:05:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=38530 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5AO-0001yf-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:05:36 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz59u-0004bf-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:05:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 23 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:vlVVuNbZEv2H08IBCfCiTQWhRjQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208787 Archived-At: Philipp Stephani writes: > That might be the intention, but I expect the outcome will be that > interest in alternative paradigms gets lost (unless such alternative > paradigms would also be merged and be available in parallel). In hope to bring the discussion further without knowing to much about the topic, you talked about "in your experiment" so do you have some sort of proof-of-concept code working with emacs? Are you willing to invest much time in implementing your solution? It seems to be similar to the commercial world, where people say "put your money where your mouth is", just in this case "put your code where your mouth is". I think people would be more convinced if there is some commitment, cause else you can formulate the nicest thing and nothing will happen. I dont want to attack you but maybe help you to "sell" your idea better. But maybe I get the situation wrong, just looks for me like thats the major motivation why people now push for that mostly done solution instead of pie in the sky?