From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool) Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:45:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87k28sdka6.fsf@jane> References: <87o9ydrzkr.fsf@mbork.pl> <87mvdriuss.fsf@mbork.pl> <87bmu6icea.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpctgieu.fsf@mbork.pl> <52e67f43-edcf-09e3-5fd6-6079763fd234@yandex.ru> <87tw7wh9sf.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487141118 6575 195.159.176.226 (15 Feb 2017 06:45:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 06:45:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50.5 Cc: 21072@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 07:45:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdtKs-00010N-TP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:45:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38794 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdtKy-0002Sz-DJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47615) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdtKr-0002Sf-4d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:45:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdtKo-0001hp-0Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:45:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:39569) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdtKn-0001gd-QO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:45:01 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADCFE6A73; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:45:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VLWwAsbG6ebn; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:44:57 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (static-dwadziewiec-jedenpiec7.echostar.pl [109.232.29.157]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1807FE6A39; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 07:44:56 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.110.48.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212394 Archived-At: On 2017-02-14, at 20:25, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Why? It seems to me that it may be of general use. > > If you want it to be general, it'll have to be better defined. > What is a "comment line"? A line containing only a comment (possibly after whitespace). I guess the docstring could benefit from explaining this. Thanks, -- Marcin Borkowski