From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:51:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2707b7f.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8A8DA980-13A7-4F8B-9D07-391728C673C9@raeburn.org> <831su4dmn4.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9300x5n.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <734D2132-71FD-414D-B091-629189742DB4@raeburn.org> <83a8889ede.fsf@gnu.org> <144D5F87-D876-485D-BAB3-2AA93627272A@raeburn.org> <83inmq53xk.fsf@gnu.org> <96D35768-314C-43F5-BD5E-B12187759DCA@raeburn.org> <123104DD-447F-4CDB-B3A0-CED80E3AC8C9@raeburn.org> <20170403165736.GA2851@acm> <2497A2D5-FDB1-47FF-AED3-FD4ABE2FE144@raeburn.org> <83lgrhpalq.fsf@gnu.org> <0D99B4FE-FEEF-4565-87D6-E230A05DEF3C@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1491314833 26147 195.159.176.226 (4 Apr 2017 14:07:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:07:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: acm@muc.de, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 04 16:07:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cvP6u-00060f-8C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 16:07:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35951 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvP70-0002VE-1I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 10:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvL7J-00058I-AL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 05:51:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvL7D-0005jO-9X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 05:51:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr0-x241.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::241]:32859) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cvL7D-0005j3-3Z; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 05:51:07 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr0-x241.google.com with SMTP id u18so40649631wrc.0; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 02:51:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=71A9IjlObFnLYonLC1XqopJd+n8w8ud/8Q1NmWArtcs=; b=phDCjKtunT2d6H4hPD+vj5kjSuY3XPdIGSRjjitR+unkc4fi5tND9hjSVzwWVENx9X uKvYj7nEb5RrkAzj3+CW9N8C4dBoFcUeCVDf7kLb3th561ueCVs2uFFAXymCR3XOju/a zivvVdhNVY/8AOiipdlHcPDUci4BRpCj5d/n0ODToyjh2/+5GHn3QQ418aK+dEze9Y5O +GbPWpbD0DCClIU0h4R1BniSCVa67qSM/gW6PvnhTAyqc2x0Ch1xL9cgclMDQchoRSnb Gr1ixdlNdoJloCango4YmIXEP6hUEV214iQhIA7WtkRYXH4Ef5NdpH+iNUxeyW+HyHsW Nl2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=71A9IjlObFnLYonLC1XqopJd+n8w8ud/8Q1NmWArtcs=; b=dyXrcuO8wqIHlf0qJSfLbzQdHzffafn8gFPRpBPrNeD/9EWuB1SCVk0p1bi+CrmRJO pvNQOq5LDVtIdx4RkXhc04rM5ONJRmZk9709oqtLc9K5FIupZHPtSo3zDlgqsHIgaKHP OiEH70jGVTjAx/rmKCF/pKDBwA/ox+Bm44w5iriyXAJGxb5X+CQP75Aoprsly0rZPIeR Kq7rLsFu3Zf8YtopxXmG354NZ1bL8EhYnpU7VCeq0squ6QieKwSH0pGYeOs0W9rUSUU0 4YGepTBiYb3G89sxRkmtkuEuIqTJAVIwxt7OkWfmFNK6W1yiKjJbdE7dck94xYaEMAvu LqMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3lv8gwHNmbGT9H2PD0p8vWjt66PT23pT16hjYynIL4KyU0z45FJYf030rN3RvyjQ== X-Received: by 10.223.174.174 with SMTP id y43mr19109737wrc.103.1491299465771; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 02:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 24sm21625066wrw.46.2017.04.04.02.51.04 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Apr 2017 02:51:05 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <0D99B4FE-FEEF-4565-87D6-E230A05DEF3C@raeburn.org> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Tue, 4 Apr 2017 04:08:06 -0400") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c0c::241 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 10:06:18 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213641 Archived-At: Ken Raeburn writes: > > I was aiming for a startup time under a tenth of a second, and didn=E2=80= =99t > get there, though there were a couple of additional things that could > be tried, with some effort. I=E2=80=99m not sure a startup time of nearl= y a > fifth of a second will feel for people. If they start Emacs once as > part of logging in, it probably won=E2=80=99t be an issue. If they start= it > every time they want to edit a file, it may be annoying to have the > startup time increased by even 0.15s. I have an emacs I normally keep running, and occasionally start one for a quick editing task. 0.15s is completely lost in the noise for me. I've tried the branch, as far as I'm concerned its speed is fine. Regards Robert