From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stepping Back: A Wealth Of Completion systems Re: [ELPA] New package: vertico Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 21:22:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87k0pdlx1g.fsf@posteo.net> References: <9c9af088-580f-9fb1-4d79-237a74ce605c@inventati.org> <874kgkxxs0.fsf@posteo.net> <3ec7e2e58a100426a22e@heytings.org> <877dleb2px.fsf@posteo.net> <3ec7e2e58a3f78988f11@heytings.org> <87ft025b42.fsf@posteo.net> <3ec7e2e58ab0222dab44@heytings.org> <87v98ykn6c.fsf@posteo.net> <3ec7e2e58a3ac3b7e852@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19770"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 07 21:23:41 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lUDm9-00055q-Ak for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 21:23:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34172 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUDm8-0007a5-CT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:23:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43682) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUDlF-0006bP-PZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:37495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lUDlB-0001Uc-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:22:45 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 197CA2400FF for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 21:22:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1617823357; bh=aDDvvPSmkco5he842g+f2HVqkMn5uvgQWYRU5Mx8SWE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=lo7OwYwcDVUmIcJXQhbkyBszAu8pAyoFq3F8HDUlSMMcULbJkr8ZZYVQK0fpz+aOI Bc82Gk02BpcgpfiVIHchLLcRQoe4tZC5K3ajq57238l9Bf5NxUZQUDxfoTKX2XK3SZ Ub5YSCdOnFRdQYLjuLJ3vnRfnXrPCPQ5dIJ98stV5Jz6VbA7oZ83Qpwi/sUjP3svAa obQc0M0Z2ujs3MVKWvTwXbTbRGqqB/LLJZbEEvCZbtvOFMeFuOyGrDYmlxx6aRQG8W sp4i/9/coK6qBf0wR6/Guuw8UxhCfnJ+ePRy6/E2VL84W87PUKNe793qrdJJsjaHD/ Aan+IYaP2GeUw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FFvRc2Yryz9rxV; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 21:22:36 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <3ec7e2e58a3ac3b7e852@heytings.org> (Gregory Heytings's message of "Wed, 07 Apr 2021 17:48:08 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267563 Archived-At: Gregory Heytings writes: > Yes, I meant something like the transient UI, but computed on the fly. > I wasn't suggesting to use transient as a basis for something else, my > remark was only about the look of the UI. Maybe, but my knowledge of transient is too limited to say. -- Philip K.