From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Brian Cully via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: EBrowse obsolete? Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:29:22 -0400 Message-ID: <87k085xldr.fsf@ditto.jhoto.spork.org> References: <72125fc3-358c-2f89-1cb6-16c4ff18185e@gmail.com> <83czdzncy5.fsf@gnu.org> <835yjqoe5n.fsf@gnu.org> <896a2dd6-598c-a40c-f88b-cee8bda5490c@yandex.ru> <83zgh2myz5.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnc6phk7.fsf@gmail.com> <9a02b1eb-20fb-93eb-7492-1387a3a7a831@gmail.com> <2dd9c74b-d822-bef2-8907-e8eedbac5eed@gmail.com> Reply-To: Brian Cully Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36017"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.6.11; emacs 28.1 Cc: Stefan Monnier , Visuwesh , Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov , gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jim Porter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 22 16:44:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oEtt7-0009A8-8N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 16:44:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38476 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEtt5-0007Yk-JL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:44:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEtp4-00036K-5n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:40:12 -0400 Original-Received: from coleridge.kublai.com ([166.84.7.167]:51772 helo=mail.spork.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oEtp2-0000H4-J1; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: from ditto (unknown [24.184.233.231]) by mail.spork.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EEAC6898; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:39:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=spork.org; s=dkim; t=1658500769; bh=Xn9x8/TRAKzOCFqbheKA8QyNaTBSh/aOsP3wco69+CE=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to; b=M6AqtMEuhWvZ2utn/udByNv/VytNrKJ4NwUJF8rbHV3dVhwgat5pTZwU819ToUoBV CKLAdQuCBM/8IjhoKqfhfjwm3T/niZwLIWmo6bM1pLIbJFG43ZV/LLpSCm3gAdE7RM QioTO0GDU1za3UWfwpfTUGu+WuTe0hB0IwqI0/mU= In-reply-to: <2dd9c74b-d822-bef2-8907-e8eedbac5eed@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=166.84.7.167; envelope-from=bjc@spork.org; helo=mail.spork.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:292443 Archived-At: Jim Porter writes: > When trying to use Eglot + Tramp on some larger projects, I'd > get hit with "Forbidden reentrant call of Tramp" every so often, > which, if memory serves, usually required a bit of poking at=20 > Eglot, or > at least retrying the operation I wanted to do. Maybe this has > improved since the last time I tried this, but (I think) fixing=20 > these > errors would go a long way towards resolving people's > complaints. That's probably easier said than done though... I use Eglot over Tramp exclusively, since it allows me to set up=20 containers with isolated and predictable environments. It's a very=20 important feature for me, which is why I submitted the initial=20 patch that made it possible. I would *love* to fix the =E2=80=9Cforbidden=20 re-entrant call to Tramp=E2=80=9D problem, but I honestly have no idea=20 how. I've tried before, but debugging this particular facet of=20 Tramp's behavior is extremely challenging for me: it's very=20 inconsistent, and I haven't figured out a way to see the chain of=20 events that's setting it off. I also suspect it's a larger problem than Eglot: I also see the=20 error fairly regularly in eshell sessions on remote hosts. I'm more than willing to put some work in here if I can get some=20 useful pointers; I *love* Tramp, and this is my only real=20 annoyance with it right now. -bjc