From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/package-vc has been merged Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2022 07:07:14 +0000 Message-ID: <87k044fvx9.fsf@posteo.net> References: <164484721900.31751.1453162457552427931@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87sfiyk3a2.fsf_-_@posteo.net> <838rkp4ptj.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgd58i7y.fsf@posteo.net> <83k0492u5i.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsew8g18.fsf@posteo.net> <83mt941cyd.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsewp0ec.fsf@posteo.net> <837d0814c9.fsf@gnu.org> <878rkooz1o.fsf@posteo.net> <831qqg1306.fsf@gnu.org> <874jvcowzm.fsf@posteo.net> <83y1soypvx.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1song5x.fsf@posteo.net> <83v8nsyof7.fsf@gnu.org> <87leoond7l.fsf@posteo.net> <87pmdxgptl.fsf@posteo.net> <87iljotycc.fsf@thaodan.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35186"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Kangas , Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Bidar Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 09 08:08:06 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1osfBt-00090J-N1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:08:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osfBK-00019s-9S; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 02:07:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osfBE-00018c-Kj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 02:07:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1osfB8-0004HD-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2022 02:07:24 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17825240103 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 08:07:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1667977635; bh=mSr8YF5DtL7Bpz/VdNHiCrzA0dxY7peeb8HnXrWFbVY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=b2Fjj4Zuo13+8LE7rXCaT2IwxSMWhVtcIl8MMeJ4BHup2jZvi964dzXI9QY2falnO XOC1mUif8mbr36w74/mNwkPGesEUJtMYJfJUYu3J3SaLi6Rygwd2BkAsBTlZSWksX5 oPx51qtA66Zru5PFj+5kaMwQdWUxDw6iQ5RwktUrQLNcuJHhJ3znc93yi1qMM4FTpq +9csQ8lC0HISm64cObFFpvyCSCYg2laCuS46Qt+a7i0PE7DE+UEzRyNJkKFCle5C6h dY/YvTRg8qzB0PqNMoCiAfmNCBfDZKdEMiQuYdg3H0VJPfdlqmZPN1E1u0kHdcz4Jx 1ZHbI1jsDnaJA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4N6bcy1GZQz6tn9; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 08:07:14 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87iljotycc.fsf@thaodan.de> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Bj=C3=B6rn?= Bidar"'s message of "Wed, 09 Nov 2022 08:51:15 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:299385 Archived-At: Bj=C3=B6rn Bidar writes: > However this process also depends on how good the system is, magit, > forge and epkg are very good. > From my past experience vc didn't came close to that.=20 Package-vc just uses vc for all version control operations, but there is no requirement to use vc yourself. If a Git repository is cloned, there is nothing stopping you from using Magit to create a commit. The only exception might be if you want to use `package-vc-prepare-patch', which does in fact depend on `vc-prepare-patch'. > package-vc also > still depends on the centralized package information and doesn't include > other sources such as melpa by default. It is as centralised as package management itself. Each archive may list package specifications, next to the archive contents. As the feature is new, MELPA hasn't probably had the time to configure the file, but I hope that might change in the future.