From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Small bug-reference.el change; safe enough for emacs-29? Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 19:35:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87k00wx8l4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o7q8x8qo.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3242"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.9.19; emacs 30.0.50 To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 05 19:37:32 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pOjtL-0000eW-Ub for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 19:37:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pOjsp-0000po-N3; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:36:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pOjso-0000pa-5s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:36:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pOjsn-0000Dp-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:36:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:In-reply-to:Date:Subject:To:From: References; bh=c86EPzFcj9dYXi4SbrRUDuBA6Hpi4Ym3/9flPVgsd4o=; b=LyLAWnjjD5u/OJ 5ADYkPYAKihu4jeC7ciBuj9YvqD5heACw4Sqvd+3W8ETUm1m/NMdX7o6BkgQqWG17RsmTlMEMyc9K XDsYnPQpQc+MJyFgo6R7W1pl6xpbaJ+guAs6Ctvk5nsekwEJHSZqOiC6cuz3bz1MEqlMheD3bmw3N Jh+n/MIG3Cn7m+stBqUpMUaag7lNkLr/rETC1pAWYalTLZE+Pz3UjWvKXqPmrdu1SmC6km7EFjatR n2gCeezSA5TPzUeAeFC4P0XL2bu9gt2xgq/guA08zTxDa/zLGebKT5gxJ6SmwLe3bK6tvF71EQB+e LtqtkiSiSLzvr9QuTe2w==; Original-Received: from auth1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.227]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pOjsn-0007Co-DH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:36:57 -0500 Original-Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FE227C0054 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 13:36:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 Feb 2023 13:36:57 -0500 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudeggedgudduhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfhgfhffvufffjgfkgggtsehttd ertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefvrghsshhilhhoucfjohhrnhcuoehtshguhhesghhnuhdr ohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveevieekteekveeigfefffeivdetgeduvdffue euudevgedttdehvdfhueevfffhnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhrnhdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhnrghlih hthidqkeeijeefkeejkeegqdeifeehvdelkedqthhsughhpeepghhnuhdrohhrghesfhgr shhtmhgrihhlrdhfmh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ib2b94485:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 13:36:56 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: <87o7q8x8qo.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303008 Archived-At: Hi again, I've missed the final ? in the subject and so the point of the message didn't get through: do you agree the change is safe enough for emacs-29? Bye, Tassilo