From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Android port of Emacs Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:19:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87jzvsevlg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <83v8fnslfz.fsf@gnu.org> <83edmask4z.fsf@gnu.org> <5c02371a-3c42-de66-70b7-4ed0d88cc3fa@gutov.dev> <834jn159vs.fsf@gnu.org> <831qi23bif.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzvuy2e7.fsf@yahoo.com> <83sfai1nq6.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz1mxvc2.fsf@yahoo.com> <83lega1iv1.fsf@gnu.org> <878rc9y7vh.fsf@yahoo.com> <83y1k9z6y6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24649"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Po Lu , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 24 17:20:31 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qD53v-0006C0-2F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:20:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qD53F-00033V-V7; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 11:19:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qD53E-00032C-2j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 11:19:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32f]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qD53C-00039v-0s; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 11:19:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-3f9189228bcso16660345e9.3; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:19:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687619981; x=1690211981; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date :gmane-reply-to-list:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VTfPbCGi589PpdnKGCCFsrWIqTPR0Z3HIdx7bxP6pEI=; b=eHLLIVqmjhAmj0IAh1ltH7OSoGcXBguErugV5vmwEAnEs7XjffnBrWB28quPL0t4Yb dZeU54U7KxPNHy8n1lKiF8h1BBdq6FnnJ2WEqA4z5iVjeGGJPIpM7Y0D861iL/sKGQj4 Y/B/ashyCqRULBFSzB0g/o2qHVctwqyw8sZ3LiUB34yfQdObMr+SyuGpEEOEzzHGc0Bk uec7R6WPlBM+5E/wHiXK0rx5zzneiSx7G/RtOmrw9dPwTXd80rgF3OhWvVT/TFJ7dtzV jHt+Mfr7DXbMVBUDx5HaUTB8AayXW4p9JXMZjcEa6i5ubz56f7qMn0D/XAneLISDBtnh ZuiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687619981; x=1690211981; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date :gmane-reply-to-list:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VTfPbCGi589PpdnKGCCFsrWIqTPR0Z3HIdx7bxP6pEI=; b=d3iXPwYDrk3R7ouL4ZH0PcNuDpzUlkl7OYTJ9lrfGUQ6nu7Z4lqJ20D/Um3LYMeTsK fAxJXrm0i2uoFFQU38a3HWX2GWIBdZObozK9Q9lssMqLpsuoMsv+3Ch8WZGWYmOVW/6L 5XYaU8l64KPth6PPHHvY6Pe0M8E9anrs2LXGTh66NP5PSy2a80sOytIMgDqMGyycksb/ 0ZIFjx6FOxFAvHEd/1mxRGOY8sjmk4d3fJErMqTfJvbZXNLHnLazMbwFcnaO3qcbAUn1 5/S0Xe4GCtxwvlU22PGrj7OSOoCl961cB6qPzf0FP06tJty04aHaj6uBg238fsFnzpV9 eigQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxg8d3KimwU9zSjGimMiJir8HFE0eXFwSYJePwoHJc1e7tp/2CJ NOn+jSz17gQiyW+gErE3wlhx3WsQMEs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ41JHZgSWSr5AlGRP5DNcAKQ9lUU2fPO09DDDbpQ3sfaQekpVevpuRb2M+0RRv+dMyv89QVbQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:228f:b0:3f9:9a93:217f with SMTP id 15-20020a05600c228f00b003f99a93217fmr12460674wmf.3.1687619981224; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([82.66.8.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z3-20020a5d4d03000000b0030aec5e020fsm2312231wrt.86.2023.06.24.08.19.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:19:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83y1k9z6y6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:54:09 +0300") Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32f; envelope-from=rpluim@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:307183 Archived-At: >>>>> On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 09:54:09 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: Eli> Lars, Stefan, Robert, Martin, Mattias, Philip, Dmitry, Jo=C3=A3o, = and all Eli> the rest of frequent contributors and developers: where are you? = I'd Eli> love to hear your opinions on this. I was going to stay out of this particular tar-pit, but just have two remarks - the NS port lost its maintainer quite some time ago: it=CA=BCs not gotten any worse - despite what has been said in this thread, the NS port works fine (for me). So I=CA=BCm either atypical or more tolerant of the issues That combined leads me to think that adding the Android port in mainline would be fine. If it breaks, so be it, as far as I can tell it=CA=BCs not caused any big knock-on changes for other platforms. Robert --=20