From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.orgmode,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Completion of links to man pages Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2023 12:48:45 +0000 Message-ID: <87jzs1i6aa.fsf@localhost> References: <87sf6pi9fn.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30647"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Max Nikulin Original-X-From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 05 14:48:04 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qoNlr-0007jt-JD for geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 14:48:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qoNlB-0003Zv-RB; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 08:47:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qoNlA-0003UB-8k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 08:47:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qoNl3-0003RV-Ny for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2023 08:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21114240104 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 14:47:11 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1696510031; bh=wVqrvNfLEBa7B+4SpHhnQ54Ji71ESpF6dJVjEp2y8lA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=KoP1rUjj+N9luXdioPSR7jWdshbAXhXz7oI0tdqezgp/2q9wVcdTHt6DORpYiO2ol k5HVcCnIvnCbqp94aEbEzJtboO31nvuz0YTkg3OpwSw2l1xhVXytMEfw4P15otqhY+ poSzOxVBpXdDIGqCCu1c6nOnuRBGXCIgc6UNtlJeNlKs3GBEuc+tTasZvmVawAxXFy KLc74LDZks2YHvPbNf+4UKGCti9dBykOl4vTd9L+CMKN/nifgX+Vt0wKeg/qSZjGP/ bj0AZWkekdc6cmkRcMu0l2waEIou5JJIdUal2Kc5b8Fk2gQ0ceyzeJ5WQ1UmjdDJ5y ohG2qH4+rx7iw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4S1WXt07gwz6tn4; Thu, 5 Oct 2023 14:47:09 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.orgmode:157582 gmane.emacs.devel:311299 Archived-At: Max Nikulin writes: >> To emacs-devel: Would it be of interest to expose man/woman completion >> API? > > Since Org mode supports a couple of previous Emacs versions, I would > avoid cross-posting. I just sent a draft to evaluate if code can be > added to Org. Previous Emacs versions are not a concern, because we can rely on the implementation details there. It is the new Emacs versions where implementation details may change that are the concern. That's why I decided to consult emacs-devel - if we cannot rely on these details, we will add maintenance burden upon us to track internal implementation changes in man/woman. >>> (let ((completion-ignore-case t)) ; See `man' comments. >> >> `completion-ignore-case' is not set in woman. > > There are enough inconsistencies between man and woman, I am unsure if > all of them should be mirrored in Org mode. They are already mirrored. Mostly. Consider the same Org file opened by different users with `org-man-command' set to 'man and 'woman. > Frankly speaking, I am unsure if woman should be supported in Org at > all. My early experience with woman.el was not nice. I tried M-x woman > RET ssh RET (openssh). woman is not trying to be complete. See [[info:woman#Introduction]]. For Org support, we already support it, and it would be a feature regression if we remove it. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at