From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 5a125fb5a97 1/2: Update to Org 9.7.3 Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 13:32:11 +0000 Message-ID: <87jzitc6jo.fsf@localhost> References: <171796793548.23337.12512115872160390161@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240609211858.A2C31C1F9FB@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87a5jtd403.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h6e1lhtd.fsf@kyleam.com> <868qzd9hjg.fsf@gnu.org> <871q53u75e.fsf@localhost> <8634pj7jni.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25186"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Monnier , kyle@kyleam.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 13 15:31:18 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sHkXt-0006IT-94 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:31:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHkXF-0006vc-Iw; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHkXD-0006ug-IO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHkXB-00022M-A3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 09:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F16E2240101 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:30:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718285431; bh=lGTBUV9fj/wcuUOetugF9IMfqGbAAPtEy0E5+D5p6qY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=jtdKhDfx+ymX3z/O5s4PWhpxZ4VKvN9imI8Vck30TkruBHLLBxC1Ox9dVdjC9pNHJ MLw1o+3i0BbD4oR7wFWoZKXqnEclMqas5nNAlxINjfhapMsLNQiRSNbCqqUJrVW7Kd MIpqFYthEht8R/ubU3MQjFK6dSxRtgnTeF6BWcWXo6icEwT1cPi9TqHuEdd2qat23Q Nnfo1nFy0gZfHQzSwaDxj8laIaRgIya2ujFeUAV/Ja9l3sCJ325bn7af/ZdHY7o8RZ qYi7v/MlubjlIUoFInMtgaFKGME5qq9/bZAc1bUcdll4nlNdwqbDNG2gDhaRiUehxI 8pIfiMRje/BLA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4W0NZY707hz6tyl; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 15:30:29 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <8634pj7jni.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320020 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >>... >> > Executing Emacs-Lisp code block at position 660552... >> > Code block evaluation complete. >> > >> > Can we please shut up these messages, or at least hide them behind >> > some $(AM_V_GEN) trick? >> >> Why? It is not much different from "scraping loaddefs..." message >> sequence. > > The messages about loaddefs are progress indicators, and show some > indication of how much is done and how much is left. By contrast, the > above don't show any progress indications, and are completely > incomprehensible, except perhaps to those who wrote the relevant code. > >> Of course, we can hide this, but seeing that some code is evaluated may >> be useful in the logs. > > People who want this in the logs could perhaps turn it on by setting > an environment variable or saying "make VAR=value". The value of VAR > should be accessible from Lisp via getenv. But I think by default > this should be off. I studied the existing Org mode code, and found that some parts of Org already disable progress messages when Org mode is running noninteractively. I now enforced this rule across all the code block evaluation done by Org, except cases when the message highlights some problem with evaluation. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=e4902995a -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at